Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Eichikiyama

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Eichikiyama[edit]

Suspected sock puppeteer

Azukimonaka (talk⁺ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser) (indef.blocked)

Suspected sock puppets

Eichikiyama (talk⁺ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
219.66.40.189 (talk⁺ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser) odn.ad.jp = Eichikiyama
Hye-Hyun (talk⁺ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser) (indef.blocked) = possibly Eichikiyama
Bukubku (talk⁺ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)

Report submission by

Caspian blue 18:54, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Azukimonaka
Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pabopa
Empress Myeongseong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Korea under Japanese rule (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Comments

I was suggested to file a SSP on Eichikiyama about one and half month ago, and his disruption keeps going on along with obvious meatpuppeting with Bukubku (talk⁺ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser). I believe the user is a reincarnation of Azukimonak, Japanese troll deeply associated with 2channel. Azukimonaka primarily had used ODN ISP[1][2], but sometimes used OCN, home ad. jp and so.net as well. Eichikiyama uses ODN as well.[3][4] just like Azukimonaka. The checkuser, Thatcher said that Eichikiyama is possibly a sock of Azukimonaka[5], and the other checkuser, YellowMonkey also said that Eichikiyama is possibly Hye-Hyun (talk · contribs)[6] who faked his identity as Korean with absolutely zero Korean ability. At first, Eichikiyama feigned to read Korean articles, but his Korean ability was revealed at Talk:Japanese_Sea_Lion#Japanese Sea Lion after his failed attempt to delete information regarding the animal's extinction. Moreover Azukimonaka has several cliche in his writing like "is being written by"[7][8], "Please teach me" etc. Eichikiyama also exactly showed the same cliche at Talk:Tribute#Korean Source [9][10] Moreover, Azukimonaka is very fond of ancient history, manga, cuisine related article, and Eichikiyama's first visit to me was Onigiri, a Japanese food as blanking sited reliable info[11][12] At Azuchi-Momoyama period, 219.66.45.199 (talk · contribs) Azukimonaka's sock appeared and Eichikiyama also took a great interest in the article. On the other hand, Bukubku (talk · contribs) registered his account on Sept.15 right after the massive sock/meat farm from 2channel disrupted at WP:AFD/South Korean cultural claims. He has been taking over mesh.ad.jp sock's edits and inserted distorted info to Empress Myeongseong. After Michael Friedrich (talk · contribs)'s socks were blocked (Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Michael Friedrich), Eichikiyama suddenly began meatpuppeting edits of Bukubku and deleted reliable sources at Korea under Japanese rule. Moreover, when massive socks emerged at Comfort women such as Katana-san (talk · contribs), Tanaka-san (talk · contribs), Que Sera Sera Sera (talk · contribs), Zerosen (talk · contribs), Honda-Hawk (talk · contribs), Eichikiyama strangely did not appear unlike his collusion with other editors on other articles, but his possible sock, Hye-Hyun appeared. Therefore, I believe at least Eichikiyama is a sock of Azukimonaka and mentioned editors. --Caspian blue 18:54, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

The only named users not already blocked are Eichikiyama and Bukubku and I have to call that Inconclusive. Strongly advise editors to use talk pages not edit war. — Rlevse • Talk • 22:39, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]