Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/DaffyDuck619
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
User:DaffyDuck619[edit]
- Evidence
Their edits are strangely similar. Same articles, almost identical edits (and in some instances completely identical). IrishGuy talk 01:35, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- DaffyDuck619 on Films that have been considered... [5]
- 203.25.140.101 on Films that have been considered... [6]
- Comments
A simple WHOIS will show that the anon is from Queensland, Australia, same as Daffy, so the coincidences keep mounting up. Exact same articles, exact same edits, exact same protestations, and no connection? Colour me skeptical. A checkuser will no doubt confirm this. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 01:49, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
1) DaffyDuck619 never contributed a citation for the Robin Williams bit of fandom for Doctor Who (except imdb.com or some original research) but I provided the citation 2) So what it's true information 3) DaffyDuck619 never added in the category section for Dave The Barbarian category: fictional cowards. I only put back fictional heroes because he falls under the category, I bet a million bucks if I deleted a category in a page which the page falls under you would put it back. 4) DaffyDuck619 has asked people not to delete the word huge, I was doing the next best thing, putting it back up there. 5) I've made contributions to pages DaffyDuck619 hasn't like the Hollywood walk of fame or the TV movie for Doctor Who. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.25.140.101 (talk • contribs)
A lot of people are from Queensland, Australia. That doesn't mean there the same person.That I don't think is evidence. Brian Boru is awesome 13:11, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- By itself, no. Along with all the other bits, it becomes more suggestive. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 15:37, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
However all of which is explained in the above paragraph I typed up — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.25.140.101 (talk • contribs)