Jump to content

Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations/2015-04-12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2015-04-12 (Suspected copyright violations)[edit]
Have to assume there's no cause for concern here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:52, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There isn't, both pages were written by the same person. Hut 8.5 06:49, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Seems fairly cleaned now, paraphrase in the opening para does follow the source somewhat closely though. JLAN, you corresponded with the author, your opinion? CrowCaw 18:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Duh, I should have noticed that the original source, blm.gov, was PD; rewrote the page anyway, left a short note for the editor. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:16, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Somewhat cleaned, EW comes in at 59:5% but there are a lot of lists of schools and art gallery names. Other thoughts? CrowCaw 18:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've brought it down to 31% and deleted the other revisions. I think this is ok now. James086Talk 06:43, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. OTRS Permission received CrowCaw 00:13, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

** Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. CrowCaw 18:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    • Article blanked for evaluation and closure through WP:CP. CrowCaw 20:20, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • EW still at 73%. Lots of long institution names and position titles, some use of quotes that seem to me to be mis-use, to wit:providing content rather than context. I see the discussions regarding this article have been somewhat nasty in tone as well. CrowCaw 18:18, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirected to Malcolm H. Stern and listed at CP due to the above, so I'll close this listing and let the issues sort out there. CrowCaw 20:20, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]