Jump to content

Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations/2012-01-07

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2012-01-07 (Suspected copyright violations)[edit]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Lerdthenerd wiki defender 15:39, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've double checked this one is definately clean, other articles checked by Katarighe still need rechecking --Lerdthenerd wiki defender 15:39, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
False positive. External site clearly quotes Wikipedia as its source and, in any case, the matches picked up by the Duplication Detector on the creation of the article are coincidental.--CharlieDelta (talk) 18:59, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
False positive following an agreed content split.--CharlieDelta (talk) 19:12, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This one's OK.--CharlieDelta (talk) 19:17, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Katarighe (Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 18:38, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. may not be worth saving the article (unreferenced and appears to be somewhat promotional) but the lead wasn't a copyvio CharlieDelta (talk) 19:42, 10 January 2012 (UTC).--CharlieDelta (talk) 19:42, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • In any case, I have purged the history of copyright violation. — madman 15:51, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. False positive. one author — madman 15:51, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree, content is largely a list, prompting the comparison --SPhilbrick(Talk) 11:04, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. CharlieDelta (talk) 20:55, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. False positive. "boilerplate" text regarding jerseys common to series of articles — madman 15:51, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. False positive. per page history (URL no longer exists) — madman 15:51, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. — madman 15:51, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Doesn't appear to be a copyright violation (apparently the author put the proper licensing notice on the original Web page, though it's now a 404), but it certainly needs cleanup. Tagged as such. — madman 16:42, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Again, boilerplate text used throughout the series of articles. — madman 16:42, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Katarighe (Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 18:53, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. I've added the interwiki attribution template to the Talk page CharlieDelta (talk) 20:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC).--CharlieDelta (talk) 20:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
False positive. No copyright problems in original article.--CharlieDelta (talk) 20:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Correct.--CharlieDelta (talk) 20:10, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. False positive. And quite the false positive too. — madman 16:42, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Placed {{Copied}} on both talk pages; the article is apparently being split. — madman 16:42, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. False positive. MER-C 02:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Correct.--CharlieDelta (talk) 20:20, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Suspected_copyright_violations/2012-01-07&oldid=1146520796"