Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2011/December/29
December 29
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete category, rename template. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 03:43, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have requested full categories for the 1910s and 1920s articles. Once those are built, this will have just 5 articles. And it will be inappropriately named. I suggest deleting the category. Rename the template to {{aero-pre1900-stub}}. Upmerge the new template, along with {{aero-1900s-stub}} to Category:Aircraft stubs. Dawynn (talk) 15:01, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support the above split, but keep the categories by decade. There is no need other than WP:BUREAUCRACY to have some decades with categories and some not. - The Bushranger One ping only 03:25, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- SupportTheLongTone (talk) 08:48, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Upmerge per nom. Ruslik_Zero 18:50, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Attempted to fill, but still undersized. Delete category, upmerge template. No prejudice against recreating category once sufficient articles tagged. Dawynn (talk) 04:12, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
Small Afghanistan geography categories
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Upmerge all as undersized. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 03:25, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Propose deleting the following small categories. Upmerge the templates to Category:Afghanistan geography stubs. No prejudice against recreation once sufficient articles can be found.
- Category:Farah Province geography stubs (20 P)
- Category:Faryab Province geography stubs (18 P)
- Category:Ghazni Province geography stubs (37 P)
- Category:Ghōr Province geography stubs (23 P)
- Category:Helmand Province geography stubs (38 P)
- Category:Herat Province geography stubs (43 P)
- Category:Samangan Province geography stubs (19 P)
Dawynn (talk) 03:00, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Upmerge. Ruslik_Zero 18:54, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Undersized, although it contains most of the permcat articles. Delete category, upmerge template, with no prejudice against recreating category once sufficient articles exist. Dawynn (talk) 02:56, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.