Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2010/October/28
October 28[edit]
Cat:Falls County, Texas stubs[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Speedied - empty category with no template
Unproposed, and contrary to standard practice (we don't have general stub categories for individual counties within states, and all these bar one are geo-stubs, so would be in a geo-stub category rather than a general one even if we did). It's an odd one - {{FallsTX-geo-stub}} exists, and, because of its relative lack of use, correctly feeds articles into Cat:Central Texas geography stubs (which, at under 200 stubs, is hardly overstretched). However, someone has created this category and is adding stubs to it manually (i.e., without a template). With this and the correctly templated articles, there are fewer than 30 Falls County stubs - fewer than half of what is needed for a separate stub category. This category should clearly be deleted, and the articles in it should be correctly marked with {{FallsTX-geo-stub}} (except for the one high school article, which should get {{Texas-school-stub}}). Grutness...wha? 22:22, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete cat - mark articles with proper stub tags. Dana boomer (talk) 15:36, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
Turkish Broadcasting stub categories[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Delete all, upmerge Cat:Turkish television station stubs as proposed bu Grutness. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:38, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is a fairly bewildering tree:
- Cat:Turkish broadcasting stubs contains nothing except one subcategory (and has no dedicated template)
- Its subcategory, Cat:Turkish television stubs contains nothing except one subcategory (and has no dedicated template)
- Its subcategory, Cat:Turkish television station stubs contains only 23 stubs - and i've just gone through the entirety of Cat:Turkey stubs - there are none more there.
- Its subcategory, Cat:Turkish television stubs contains nothing except one subcategory (and has no dedicated template)
At the very least, we have two "shell" categories which can be ditched, but with only 23 stubs, I think the whole lot can be upmerged into Cat:Turkey stubs and Cat:Television station stubs (or its European and Asian counterparts). Grutness...wha? 05:07, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Turkish broadcasting and Turkish television stubs, upmerge Turkish television stations to parent cats. Dana boomer (talk) 15:35, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.