Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xmonca/Archive

Xmonca

Xmonca (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

30 November 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

• Juandmg (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) ( Clerk note: original case name)

• Apolo1951 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

Tag-team speedy deletion tagging and prodding of José L. Domingo by two SPAs. Diffs: Juandmg, Special:Diff/1124599146, Special:Diff/1124741019; Xmonca, Special:Diff/1124740095 —David Eppstein (talk) 17:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Update: Added Apolo1951, another SPA who earlier but still recently removed some negative information from the BLP (diffs: [1], [2]), the restoration of which may have been the trigger for the deletion attempts. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José L. Domingo. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:30, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• Juandmg and Xmonca are extremely  Likely. Apolo1951 is  Possible on technical evidence, I have a feeling that one is off-wiki coordination or responding to some social media campaign or other.
• Xmonca is the older account, so I'll move this case shortly. firefly ( t · c ) 11:39, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
• This seems to be a (misguided) attempt to fix a serious violation of WP:BLP that the community failed to address for quite some time. I assume the accounts are some people close to the subject of the article. I posted COI warnings accordingly.  Closing without action. MarioGom (talk) 10:36, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

---