Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stho002/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Stho002

Stho002 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
26 June 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


The most recent edit (at the time of this filing) for this IP was to restore Four dimensionalism to the last version edited by User:Stho002 before he was blocked for socking as an IP to avoid 3RR (by his own admission) and for edit warring. [1]. This IP also geolocates to New Zealand, from where Stho002 edits. Furthermore, a note on the IP's talk page indicates it's a shared proxy from an educational institution located in NZ. BrideOfKripkenstein (talk) 03:03, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


 Looks like a duck to me MacMedtalkstalk 03:09, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
19 November 2013
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Brought an AN/I thread against an editor, then outed himself as the blocked user in a related thread (also linked from there). Considering allegations of admin abuse on Wikispecies, might want to notify the bureaucrats over there, if it's any use; he was blocked and desysoped back in '08 for admin abuse as well. Requesting CU for sleepers, as another user alleged previous block evasion in the same thread as the admin abuse report. Ansh666 05:19, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Hi, please be aware that lying behind this investigation request is a group of Wikipedia editors who have banded together against sister project Wikispecies. This small group has now decided to systematically remove Wikispecies interwikis from WP articles. These were added in good faith and in full accord with WP policy guidelines. I think we have a problem, Houston .. RealityCzecher (talk) 05:48, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The substance of this investigation has nothing to do about Wikispecies, it's about your block evasion, which is unacceptable. I tacked on the other part as background, and some interesting reading material in case someone here wants to do some more about this...problem. Ansh666 05:58, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
As I said above, I really do very strongly urge anybody here who has some control over the project to consider the wider issues at stake here. A small group of WP editors has decided to systematically remove content from WP articles that was added in good faith and full compliance with WP policy. The sockpuppetry is a red herring. This small group of WP editors clearly sees Wikispecies (a Wikimedia sister project) as competition to be stifled and thwarted, instead of as another part of the same overall project. We are entering a phase in science where all sources are being linked together to create one big web of knowledge. This group of WP editors is aggressively resisting that. Furthermore, it is surely AGAINST NPOV to remove links to sources which give alternative viewpoints (classifications in this case). It makes it look like the WP POV is the only game in town, whereas it is'nt RealityCzecher (talk) 06:11, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

12 February 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Admitted as much on m: and created the account solely to discourage the promotion of CheckUsers on Wikispecies. Blocked here for abusing multiple accounts and blocked several other places for cross-wiki problems (e.g. has no less than 20 sockpuppets at species:). ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded now: both accounts are globally blocked. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:32, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fix incorrect SPI format.--GZWDer (talk) 20:00, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

24 March 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

In response to a link to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stho002/Archive, the new user refers to "raking up dirt from my history". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:12, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

This case is being reviewed by Cabayi as part of the clerk training process. Please allow Cabayi to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on Cabayi's Talk page or on this page if more appropriate. Cabayi (talk) 11:35, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

03 November 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Recently blocked as a sock of this globally-blocked puppetmaster on Wikispecies. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:33, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

10 November 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


After GruesomeBalls was blocked for sockpuppetry, Pigsonthewing (talk · contribs) archived a discussion. The new account RegisteredSocksOffender undid that with their first edit. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 05:25, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Stho002/Archive&oldid=1044265713"