Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pci world/Archive
Pci world
- Pci world (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
30 October 2010
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Shiasp101 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Ari4eva (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- LTD1959 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Appears accounts created to support "Keep" for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michele Bowie. Accounts are all SPA and lacking other article edits. ttonyb (talk) 01:08, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
[edit]See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
[edit]Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
[edit]All 
Confirmed as the same, plus
- Kivieb (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) TNXMan 15:14, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Administrator note All tagged and blocked. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 15:20, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
02 November 2010
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- InformationWare (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by Daedalus969
[edit]This sock wasn't caught in the first sweep, but it's obviously the same person per the editing style(signing before post, talking the same way about the same stuff). It seems they tried to evade appearing as a sock by using the same style of markup as the signature of the user who was striking the votes by the sock/meatpuppets. CU is needed for another rangeblock, sleeper check. I mean, they obviously got around the first one, and evaded CU the first time. — Dædαlus Contribs 08:38, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
[edit]See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
[edit]Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
[edit]It is 
Possible this account is related to the ones in the archive. Two different ISPs, two different states (although geolocation places them within a few hours of each other). TNXMan 11:50, 2 November 2010 (UTC)