Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Panda619/Archive
Panda619
- Panda619 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
14 December 2019[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets[edit]
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
In the article Weathering with You, I made a change per Template:Infobox film (Special:Diff/929253646).
It was then reverted by Panda619 to their own revision at 929174737 (Special:Diff/929457153), undoing *all* of the edits made in between, including edits made by other users and my change on the Rotten Tomatoes rating. They then approached me in my talk page accusing me of removing sourced information, and explaining their reasoning. I responded and accused them of the sources given not corresponding to the information in the article and it is not in align with Template:Infobox film and MOS:FILM.
I gave them almost 24 hours to respond or I would revert, which I did (Special:Diff/929802183) as they did not respond. I accused them of WP:ORIGINAL, specifically WP:SYNTHESIS.
The user Panda619 has since ceased activity in that account, and no further attempts were made to discuss in any talk pages including mine.
The rest is all edit warring using IP addresses (Special:Diff/930406768) (Special:Diff/930694218).
The second sockpuppet has yet again reverted changes as I am making this report even after I warned them of WP:SOCK. They also continued to edit in other articles. I will revert again but will only do so once this is resolved.
From the evidence, there's heavy sign of WP:DUCK. LightKeyDarkBlade (talk) 12:07, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Comments by other users[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
- No enough evidence to convince me of socking. I've left a warning to remember to login, and we'll leave it at that. The issues of edit-waring, etc, are out of scope for SPI, but could be addressed elsewhere. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:52, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
11 May 2024[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets[edit]
- Omegapapaya (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Leexizhang (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Beastmastah (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools
Found through report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Okiloma, but these accounts are unrelated to that case and instead related to this case. Confirmed to this case through 619XXXX (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 17:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users[edit]
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
- Split from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Okiloma. As mentioned these accounts are
Confirmed to this case through 619XXXX (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). 
Blocked and tagged. Closing. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 17:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
