Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PRProgRock/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


PRProgRock

PRProgRock (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
02 April 2012[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

NikanaStarkiller's edits have many similarities to PRProgRock (who has been indef blocked) and his IP accounts - most obviously, they both have a tendency to edit articles relating to Digimon, Bone (comics), Star Wars, Spaceballs, and chocolate milk beverages. In particular, one recent edit summary from NikanaStarkiller ([1]) is nearly identical in language to the pleading tone of PRProgRock ([2]) and his IP account ([3]). I believe NikanaStarkiller is PRProgRock evading his block. MikeWazowski (talk) 04:14, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
  • NikanaStarkiller is a  Confirmed sock.  IP blocked. No comment on the given IPs. WilliamH (talk) 04:25, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Sock blocked, tagged. TNXMan 16:46, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

05 August 2012[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


PRProgRock was indef-blocked a second time on July 14 for disruptive editing, WP:EW, and failing to adhere to WP:CONSENSUS; all this after having promised not to return to this pattern of editing, an unblock that barely lasted a month. 67.169.94.246 is a confirmed IP for PRProgRock, by his own admission. Using this account, PRProgRock has returned to the same pattern of edits, making the same changes that led to his latest indef block. MikeWazowski (talk) 16:04, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just added 67.169.94.197 - it's definitely him again, making the same WP:OR-based claim on Spy vs. Spy. MikeWazowski (talk) 23:38, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

information Administrator note IP reblocked for 3 months. Jafeluv (talk) 18:42, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • information Administrator note Second IP address blocked for a month. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 17:32, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

09 August 2012[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Same as before - blocked on multiple IPs for adding original research disguised with an improper reference on Spy vs. Spy. Warned and blocked repeatedly, and at it again. MikeWazowski (talk) 03:35, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

information Administrator note IP blocked for 72 hours. Jafeluv (talk) 19:03, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]



09 August 2012[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Another recently created account (after PRProgRock's latest indef block), similar pattern of editing as PRProgRock: edits similar articles, like Spaceballs, Spy vs Spy, and stuff related to TV series MAD. I suggest we look for sleeper accounts as well - this kid won't give up. MikeWazowski (talk) 13:19, 9 August 2012 (UTC) MikeWazowski (talk) 13:19, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Does my Sockpuppet username sound familiar to you? Schwarz1921Weiss1961Prohias1998 (talk) 17:12, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

 Looks like a duck to me, so blocked and tagged as such. This could still use a CU check to find out any remaining accounts. Jafeluv (talk) 19:11, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]