Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Niezwmxa Boro/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Niezwmxa Boro

Niezwmxa Boro (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

14 July 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Br. Nijwmsa (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Layer23 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Mike VTalk 16:36, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

19 October 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Similar username to User:Niezwmxa Boro and exact same userpage biography (1, 2) as previous sock User:Br. Nijwmsa. McGeddon (talk) 12:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]


20 October 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Similar username, joined Wikipedia half an hour after the previous sock was blocked, recreated Chandan Boro. McGeddon (talk) 12:57, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  •  Blocked and tagged GABgab 03:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

04 November 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

This user awarded a barnstar to Niezwmxa Boro sock account Nijwmsa. In addition, both are involved in editing the Bodo grammar article, and both accounts have a history of creating inappropriate pages. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:18, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, it appears that this user's username is basically the suspected master's username in Hindi. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:20, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  •  In progress - Katietalk 15:20, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh, sorry to jump the queue, I didn't see there was an SPI until after I blocked. This was obviously Nijwmsa, so I blocked indef on that basis, per a report at AIV. I didn't know there was a longer sock history. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:30, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • These accounts are  Confirmed to each other:
There are a couple of accounts that have no edits that are possible, but I'm not ready to list them yet. Blocked, and I'll let the clerks tag. Katietalk 15:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
information Administrator note Marking as closed. Mkdwtalk 00:14, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

06 November 2016[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Almost the same username as past socks (eg. User:Nijwmsa Boro (WU)), and the user starts by immediately messing around with invalid templating on their user page (eg. 1, 2). Also tinkering with a user template belonging to a user that a past sock was barnstarring. McGeddon (talk) 15:48, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  •  Confirmed and blocked. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:27, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Closing. GABgab 17:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

10 February 2017[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

This user filed a request at WP:CHU/S asking to be renamed to "Níjwmsa Boro"; AntiSpoof revealed it to be too similar to "Nijwmsa Boro`", which is a confirmed sock. Their current username is also similar to निजोमसा बर', another blocked sock. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 18:02, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • CU wasn't useful here, but the behavioral evidence is very strong, and I blocked and tagged the account before I saw this. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 21:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]