Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mutia ti la union updates/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Mutia ti la union updates

Mutia ti la union updates (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

11 January 2024[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

This edit compared with this edit. Clear . Pinging @Cabayi: since he blocked the first 2. Nobody (talk) 13:17, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm adding more as they come. Nobody (talk) 13:36, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Also, it's glaringly obvious they're all the same person. CU is unnecessary here. Cabayi (talk) 14:07, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cabayi If you think the disruption wasn't big enough to warrant a block, then I agree that it isn't block evasion. But I'd say it's still Contributing to the same page or discussion with multiple accounts and the edit summaries could be considered Impersonating an administrator. Nobody (talk) 14:38, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Spicy, I also filed a request for page protection due to the IP editing. Nobody (talk) 06:33, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Spicy I think they already created more, see here. Nobody (talk) 06:36, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • I ran a check because one or two policy-violating usernames might be a misunderstanding, but five of them, one of which impersonates an established editor, just looks like trolling. The listed accounts are  Confirmed plus

21 January 2024[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

WP:DUCKs reinstating edits on Mutya ng Pilipinas 2018 made by previously blocked socks. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 06:41, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Appears to be a joe job of an admin on the Tagalog Wikipedia who reverted their edits, User:WayKurat. Could be worth setting up an edit filter for the name they insert into articles. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 06:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also worth adding Special:Contributions/216.247.92.86 to the pool, blocked the other day by ScottishFinnishRadish. Some others that escaped a block: Special:Contributions/216.247.90.99 & Special:Contributions/216.247.92.224. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 06:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 06:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just added Robot icon of bot to the sockpile. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 06:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you wouldn't mind throwing User:Bot plsss man (AND User:Math bot robutic!) onto the sock pile for this and this respectively, it looks suspiciously birdlike. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 07:03, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's also Qwe bot quattt, Unless to be Unless and Phili pageantry bot at Mutya ng Pilipinas 2017. Nobody (talk) 09:14, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also 216.247.88.65 and Cutie pitttt (Name obvious duck from last times User:Cutie edits). Nobody (talk) 09:20, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Suggesting to rangeblock the IP address that this vandal uses: 216.247.80.0/20. I have blocked this at tl.wiki as well. -WayKurat (talk) 10:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Added. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 16:02, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • I have also blocked Phili pageantry bot, Qwe bot quattt, and Unless to be Unless, and I have partially blocked 216.247.88.0/21 from mainspace for two weeks. Virtually all of the editing from that IP range after 9 January has been this person, so risk of collateral damage is fairly low. When I made that block I had not seen WayKurat's suggestion of a block on a larger range, but I will look into it. JBW (talk) 10:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have now looked at the other half of WayKurat's suggested range, 216.247.80.0/21. There have been no recent edits from that range on English Wikipedia, and at a quick glance I didn't see anything which looked relevant in edits further back either. However, I did see editing from this range on Tagalog Wikipedia from November 2023 which, judging from the topics of the articles, look likely to be relevant. (I didn't check the content of the edits.) As far as I had previously seen this had seemed to be a fairly new problem, so far less than a month old, but that makes it look more like potential LTA. JBW (talk) 10:37, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  In progress.  Confirmed so far:

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:38, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also  Confirmed are HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:03, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
and appear to be technically Red X Unrelated to the above but given the behaviour I wouldn't put any stock in that. They're  Confirmed to each other. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:09, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not sure that tagging achieves anything in this case so I haven't bothered but no objection if somebody sees value in it that I don't. All accounts are blocked and all IPs are rangeblocked (anon only and not as a result of checkuser data). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:20, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

28 January 2024[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Copied edit summaries, playing good sock-bad sock at Senior High (TV series).

Registered account reverts IP edit here, IP editor inserts the non-notable individual here.

CU requested, as there are likely more accounts per past investigations. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 07:35, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For robotic and IP, see these edits. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 08:02, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

That registered account uses edit summarys of others like the earlier socks did and the IP addded the usual Christian Joy Bautista (Time to get this this name on a disallow filter). Clear Ducks. Nobody (talk) 07:43, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • The two named accounts are confirmed to each other and very  Likely to past accounts. no No comment with respect to IP address(es) but I see they are already blocked so I'll just close this. Redirect arrow Global lock(s) requested. Spicy (talk) 14:13, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

30 January 2024[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Philippine beauty pageant cruft. Any sleepers? - UtherSRG (talk) 11:22, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

@Girth Summit: FYI, these 2 already blocked accounts are also this user.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

02 February 2024[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Edits show clear duck.Nobody (talk) 07:33, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hutwiki 5 is an impersonation from Hotwiki same as they did to WayKurat. Nobody (talk) 07:40, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Some already blocked by Materialscientist and Oshwah, don't know if they saw the connection to this SPI. Nobody (talk) 07:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Spicy: Is asking for page protection better than asking for blocks to deal with the IPs since they're switching this often?

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Basically  Confirmed:

09 February 2024[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Edits the same articles. Also copies the edit summary of those that revert them like earlier puppets. Nobody (talk) 06:03, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Spicy The IP got rangeblocked. Nobody (talk) 19:26, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • These accounts are now blocked and have been checked. no No comment with respect to IP address(es) but it hasn't edited in several days so a block would not be useful at this point regardless. Closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 19:14, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oh, I didn't notice. That explains why it hasn't edited :) Spicy (talk) 19:27, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

12 February 2024[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Added Jayson Cesar Lorenzo Bautista, which is the usual spam. Nobody (talk) 09:31, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Now CU blocked. Redirect arrow Global lock(s) requested for this and the above case, closing. Spicy (talk) 19:16, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

21 February 2024[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

These are the latest of the socks. Nobody (talk) 08:04, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Ran some checks, didn't see anything that wasn't already blocked. no No comment with respect to IP address(es). Tagged, locks requested, closing. Spicy (talk) 15:05, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

27 February 2024[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

After the blocking of several other sockpuppets operated by this user (User:OhmyPRINCE, User:Wonderfully Editor), this account has popped up. It has the exact same user page as past blocked sock Oh marimar ahhhh and is editing the same pages as past socks. This is a WP:DUCK case but I see mentions of LTA in the "Oh marimar ahhhh" block log, so flagging for CU. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 11:35, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Update: hmm. Seeing a lot of overlap with Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mutia ti la union updates. I'm not sure how to proceed with this but will leave here so a CU can look at it. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 11:41, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

29 February 2024[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

WP:DUCK per editing behavior. Edits the same articles with the most recently blocked sock REPETITION is not allowed and has the same user page introducing themselves as a "new" editor (see here). Please check for any sleeper accounts as this vandal is known in creating multiple sockpuppet accounts upon detection. - WayKurat (talk) 02:18, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

02 March 2024[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Edited pages and edit summaries make this a clear duck. Nobody (talk) 06:30, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

03 March 2024[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Returning to Raphaelle Ortega-David which this sockfarm usually edits, continually leaving the same messages on their own talk page featuring emojis (and in the edit summaries), generally a DUCK but requesting CU due to the proclivity of this sockfarm. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 11:05, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

30 April 2024[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Already blocked, same username pattern and edits. Please check for sleepers. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:56, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

As someone familiar with this user I agree with SFR that this is an obvious sock. Nobody (talk) 14:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mutia_ti_la_union_updates/Archive&oldid=1221836363"