Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Meer Refat Ahmed/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Meer Refat Ahmed

Meer Refat Ahmed (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

07 February 2017[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Likely a duck of the earlier account that has repeatedly recreated Premi O Premi and other variations. It's likely there are other older socks but they seem to be inactive currently. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 00:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quick note:I've moved the duplicate SPI into this one and added RM's comment. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 11:53, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

The behavioral evidence of sockpuppetry is that both of these accounts are editing in order to post articles about a movie, Premi o Premi, which has been the subject of three deletion discussions. Only an administrator can see the history of contributions of Meer Refat Ahmed because everything has been deleted. Their talk page shows the nominations for deletion at User talk:Meer Refat Ahmed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Meer_Refat_Ahmed Neelkaya https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Neelkaya Robert McClenon (talk) 01:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]


07 February 2017[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Obvious duck - recreation of Premi O Premi Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 11:49, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Already blocked by Samtar. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:12, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]