Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lomerezco/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Lomerezco

Lomerezco (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:

Report date November 11 2009, 16:11 (UTC)[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets [edit]



Evidence submitted by NoHenry [edit]

Vandalism on the Rosa Blasi page similar to several other previously banned accounts, including the above named puppetmaster NoHenry (talk) 16:11, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties [edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users [edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments [edit]
Conclusions [edit]

information Administrator note Blocked and tagged. MuZemike 21:10, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.


Report date November 21 2009, 00:29 (UTC)[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets [edit]



Evidence submitted by NoHenry [edit]

Vandalism on Rosa Blasi similar to several other previously banned users, including named puppetmaster. NoHenry (talk) 00:29, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties [edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users [edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments [edit]
Conclusions [edit]
  • information Administrator note Blocked and tagged. NW (Talk) 00:31, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.




Report date December 1 2009, 22:22 (UTC)[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets [edit]


Evidence submitted by NoHenry [edit]

Vandalism on Rosa Blasi page similar to several previously banned accounts. NoHenry (talk) 22:22, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by accused parties [edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users [edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments [edit]
Conclusions [edit]
  • Blocked and tagged. NW (Talk) 22:40, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.


03 December 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Vandalism on Rosa Blasi identical to previously banned accounts NoHenry (talk) 20:26, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
13 April 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Vandalism on Rosa Blasi similar to previously banned accounts. NoHenry (talk) 15:19, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

 Confirmed that Melnkim (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) and Dazryebabbi (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) are the same as each other. Mollieyouindangergurl (talk · contribs) is a  Possible match. All of the accounts in the archive are  Stale. TNXMan 15:34, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

26 April 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Vandalism on Rosa Blasi similar to previously banned accounts. NoHenry (talk) 15:05, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

 Likely match to Melnkim (talk · contribs). TNXMan 18:02, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

10 February 2014[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Vandalism on Rosa Blasi identical to several previously banned accounts NoHenry (talk) 18:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
  • Suspected sock blocked indef as vandalism-only account, closing now. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
08 November 2014[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Vandalism on Rosa Blasi similar to previously banned accounts. NoHenry (talk) 17:06, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
  • Vandalism of a more or less similar kind, on the article mostly attacked by this sockpuppeteer, does suggest that this may be another sockpuppet. However, the vandalism is not so similar to any of the edits by earlier accounts that I have seen to make it certain, and one edit that looks vaguely similar is not enough to go on. I would ask for a CheckUser, but of the sample of past sockpuppets that I have looked at, all are long since stale, so a CheckUser is not possible. Under the circumstances, the only thing to do is to close this case without any action, but if the same account continues in a similar way, I will be very willing to block as a vandalism-only account, whether or not it is a sockpuppet. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:33, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Lomerezco/Archive&oldid=1043556763"