Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kim99/Archive
Kim99
- Kim99 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
28 June 2022
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]See history of Talk:Lavender oil. Same arguments were made earlier in June by Kim99, who stated here that they were discontinuing discussion out of frustration for not getting support for proposed sources and content changes. Over the past week at the same article and talk page, and at DRN, the IP has been relentlessly trying to insert content and questionable sources against consensus. Same behavior by these two editors. Zefr (talk) 16:53, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Linking my response here as well for admins reviewing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:50.45.170.185 Thank you 50.45.170.185 (talk) 17:08, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
>Same arguments were made earlier in June by Kim99
I disagree. For one, "Kim" was trying to include primary sources which goes completely against everything I've stated since the beginning. He also seems to have some kind of bone to pick with "western" medicine. A distinction that does not seem helpful but instead rather inflammatory. The truth is the truth.
>Over the past week
June 26th was not a week ago... Hopefully this misunderstanding did not cause you any IRL scheduling troubles.
>and at DRN
Yes, the DRN that you were a part of until the moderator shut it down because you made this report. Pretty disruptive behavior IMO.
>the IP has been relentlessly trying to insert content
So have you been relentlessly trying to suppress said content then? I've been civil on the talk page and on the DRN.
>and questionable sources against consensus
The page as it stands has a source I added from consensus. We also reached consensus on another source and *you* removed it without consensus during an active DRN where the moderator asked everyone to stop editing the page while we discuss things.
>Same behavior by these two editors.
Not in the slightest. Kim99 probably did not know you should Be Bold on wikipedia so he never made any changes to the actual page. Not everyone that disagrees with you is the same person. Not everyone that finds the same peer-reviewed research and wants to add it to wikipedia is the same person. 50.45.170.185 (talk) 06:36, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]- CU
Check declined – Checkusers will not link accounts to IPs, per the privacy policy. Spicy (talk) 20:02, 29 June 2022 (UTC) - It's hard to get too worked up over a handful of edits on a talk page. I left Kim99 uw-login which seems like enough for now. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:38, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
