Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kbq430/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Kbq430

Kbq430 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

23 July 2019[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

See below. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:30, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]


13 June 2020[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


User who's been nominating a lot of pages for deletion, with very little apparent understanding of how our notability standards work — they've nominated several topics that are perfectly fine. What leads me to believe that they might be a sockpuppet is that their language in AFD nominations is highly similar to some other past sockpuppets of Kbq430: compare, for instance, User19004's "Not a notable publication; not encyclopedically relevant." here to blocked Kbq sock User:NL19931993's "Not a notable roadway; not in any sense encyclopedically relevant." here (where, notice, the topic was a provincial highway, thus betraying a similar misunderstanding of how notability works on here too.) It also bears mention, because it's almost certainly not a coincidence, that both The Scope and Torbay Road are in the same city. Bearcat (talk) 03:04, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Looks pretty likely based on the behaviour and CU makes this  Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) too. Sock blocked and tagged, closing. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:26, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

01 July 2020[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


The previous sock User:User19004 was blocked on June 16. And then User:User13769 started editing on June 18th, in the exact same topic areas. Interaction analysis here. Nfitz (talk) 18:47, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]


08 December 2020[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Same habit of rapid-fire AfD nominations on Canadian topics - compare [1] and [2] (also note the distinctive edit summaries). Significant subject matter overlap with previous accounts (mainly Newfoundland and Labrador-related articles) - see Editor Interaction Analyzer report with the two most recent socks. Spicy (talk) 21:55, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  •  Clerk note: Overlap and distinctive edit summaries when nominating for AfD are convincing.  Blocked and tagged. GeneralNotability (talk) 19:49, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

30 December 2020[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


Pro forma report. See below. Mz7 (talk) 07:16, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]