Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Juko534/Archive
Juko534
- Juko534 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
25 September 2017
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Kar321 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Luke39 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Mehow98 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Pozytyv (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Savoy38 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Surroy378 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Moe32 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Spam/LinkReports/mensreviewzone.com reflink spamming mensreviewzone.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com —PaleoNeonate – 06:53, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- The throwaway accounts have characteristic edit patterns of large spam sock farms. Pozytyv appears to be an undisclosed paid editor -- for starters, something like this and this (note where the image is sourced to) shouldn't be coming from someone who is here to build the encyclopedia. MER-C 07:06, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
Clerk endorsed - Possible sockfarm. I'm sure of a connection here but CU might reveal more accounts than expected in these sort of situations. Pozytyv is positively stale but it is as MER-C puts it. QEDK (愛 • 海) 12:28, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- Moe32 (talk · contribs), Luke39 (talk · contribs), Kar321 (talk · contribs), Mehow98 (talk · contribs), Surroy378 (talk · contribs), Savoy38 (talk · contribs) and Juko534 (talk · contribs) all belong to the same editor.
No comment with respect to IP address(es) - Mailer Diablo 22:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Moe32 (talk · contribs), Luke39 (talk · contribs), Kar321 (talk · contribs), Mehow98 (talk · contribs), Surroy378 (talk · contribs), Savoy38 (talk · contribs) and Juko534 (talk · contribs) all belong to the same editor.
- All done. QEDK (愛 • 海) 07:25, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
23 January 2018
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Pozytyv (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
This user couldn't be CU'ed before but now there may be something to go on. MER-C may have more to add as he had brought up the evidence the first time around. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:18, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]- MER-C, I see the consistent linkspamming with this account (same source from what I can tell unless I'm misreading), but I for some reason Special:Undelete isn't bringing anything up on that file. Was the source the same? TonyBallioni (talk) 20:14, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- c:File:Water-based penis pump.jpg (now deleted). MER-C 21:38, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Nick: could you verify the source of the deleted file on Commons and see if it matches the link spamming or anything else found in the archives? TonyBallioni (talk) 22:34, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Source given is http(s)://mensreviewzone.com/bathmate-reviews/ -- Nick (talk) 22:42, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- So we have two instances of linkspamming the same link that all the confirmed accounts were. This one has more edits, however, which is the one thing giving me pause as the rest were throwaways. Mailer diablo, do you remember anything from the previous socks where you could do a check, or is this all to stale and old? TonyBallioni (talk) 22:50, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Source given is http(s)://mensreviewzone.com/bathmate-reviews/ -- Nick (talk) 22:42, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Nick: could you verify the source of the deleted file on Commons and see if it matches the link spamming or anything else found in the archives? TonyBallioni (talk) 22:34, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- c:File:Water-based penis pump.jpg (now deleted). MER-C 21:38, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- I don't retain CU data, and nothing obvious has caught my eye so far. - Mailer Diablo 12:04, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
- I think this is highly circumstantial, but not enough for a duck block. Since there is no CU data that can be helpful here, I'm closing. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:42, 26 January 2018 (UTC)