Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Joaquinito01/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Joaquinito01

Joaquinito01 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

26 September 2017[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

I blocked Joaquinito01 for abusing Twinkle and spurious deletion-tagging yesterday, then Joaquinito2017 appeared and did exactly the same. There's a concerning list of potential socks at ListUsers - most are stale but the others listed above are not. User Bearfield1 appeared today to do almost exactly the same thing. Stale accounts: User:Joaquinito2050 is related according to cross-wiki logs.[1] and User:Joaquinito8243 is almost certainly related.[2][3] User:Joaquinito25 has all the signs of a duck, and User:Joaquinito1992 sure looks dodgy. Request a CU to determine any active sleepers, and hopefully a range block. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 13:30, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • Also added User:Joaquinito2016 who appeared after this report was started. It looks like we might need to trawl that category. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:00, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  •  Clerk endorsed - Please compare these accounts and check for sleepers. Thanks, GABgab 15:07, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • All above-listed accounts are  Likely plus AutoBOT (talk · contribs). Many of the accounts are globally locked for cross-wiki abuse, so I believe the stewards should have already done a similar sweep. - Mailer Diablo 22:58, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • All  Blocked and tagged. GABgab 23:45, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

30 September 2017[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

another username that is similar to other BOTs this user created. Bogus reports on AIV: 1 - user being reported is a Wiki Ed student user who has done nothing wrong -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. ← 19:46, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  •  Looks like a duck to me, and blocked by Widr. I may as well mention that I blocked CAMINOANDALUZ (talk · contribs) earlier today - basically self-confirmed and already listed in the Spanish category. Both accounts have been thrown to stewards for a global lock. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

29 October 2017[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

The same "Joaquinito" username as well as the same kind of odd anti-vandalism style edits. I've requested CU per the fact that the history of the user appears to include multiple sleeper accounts and that this account was created 10 months ago [7]. Thanks. –72 (talk) 15:54, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

This case is being reviewed by Sir Sputnik as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

  •  Clerk endorsed - This account is already blocked, but given the number of accounts Joaquinito as used in the past, the existence of others is likely. Please check to identify potential sleepers. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:24, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Three sleepers from earlier: User:NohaBOT, User:Disney93 and User:La BSOD. No others immediately apparent. -- zzuuzz (talk) 16:37, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tagging and closing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:58, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

07 November 2017[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


Same vandalism-like behaviour on select articles, both claiming to be different UK council paid editors. Special:Diff/809154069 & Special:Diff/809156324 Lewis Cawte (Talk) 13:25, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

This case is being reviewed by Sir Sputnik as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

  •  Done and accounts re-tagged. I see nothing else to do so case closed. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:19, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

09 March 2020[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Using name on other sites LTA uses, demanding tone, mentions bots, requests wiki @ Miraheze for Spanish simple wp - seen it all before. ~ RhinosF1(Chat) / (Contribs) 07:30, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Requested lock. Reported to ca@. ~ RhinosF1(Chat) / (Contribs) 07:31, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

07 March 2020[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

A hoax bot specifically removing discussions by User:Jonesey95, and a master account that has no edits other than making the sock. I already reverted all edits done by the sock, and after I sent my second warning to the suppose bot/sock; the bot/sock edits stopped. The account is already connected together since the log shows that the bot was made by Sra. Isabella. I want to know if the master is actually a sock of someone who's been blocked. Jerm (talk) 22:02, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

@ST47: and @Cabayi: I thank both of you for your help. I just knew there was something odd about the master. There's just no way a new account with little to no edits can suddenly make a bot account. Jerm (talk) 20:20, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

28 April 2021[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Can it get more obvious than this? Requesting CU to see if there are any sleepers to block and proxies to get rid of. JavaHurricane 02:27, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I think you can find some other accounts to check against from the Steward global account log and from cuwiki, given the LTA. JavaHurricane 02:28, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Account locked for ban evasion. JavaHurricane 03:26, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Blablubbs, I swear there used to be another Joaquinito SPI (which I've read in the past but could not find when reporting this sock). Could you please search it and do the appropriate merge? JavaHurricane 15:18, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • This case is being reviewed by Blablubbs as part of the clerk training process. Please allow him to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on his talk page or on this page if more appropriate.
    Since this is a long-running LTA, I assume that necessary action on the CU side has been handled via the relevant interwiki mailing lists. Closing. Blablubbs|talk 11:43, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


07 July 2021[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]


Joaquinito01 is a globally banned user by persistent vandalism in eswiki and Commons; see the confession in the user page. Valdemar2018 (talk) 21:14, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This account, with two edits in enwiki and three edits in eswiki, was globally banned. Valdemar2018 (talk) 21:28, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

19 August 2021[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Per username. Please check for sleepers, thanks. JavaHurricane 15:21, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Joaquinito01/Archive&oldid=1039734775"