Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Honeysama/Archive
Honeysama
- Honeysama (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
17 December 2019
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Wmomo55 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Similar style of editing [1] and [2]. Edits the same points; Honeysama argued about the point of Baidu Fudian Awards [3] and Wmomo55 removed the sourced info [4]. 102.96.113.45 (talk) 13:41, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]- No evidence of socking. Closing without action. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:22, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
01 January 2020
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Clowzsama (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Similar usernames, editing patterns and area of interests 79.106.209.241 (talk) 14:22, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The "similar usernames" evidence could maybe be discarded as the only part of the username is a Japanese suffix, and both usernames are 9 letters long, which is more likely to be coincidental. Primal Groudon (talk) 04:21, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
Check declined by a checkuser. Based on the mannerisms of the accounts, I believe they are the same user. Compare their writing styles here, [5][6], where both accounts leave messages on the user talk pages of IP addresses. Compare also [7][8]. With that being said, neither account's edits overlap with the other. For that reason, this could be a lost password or similar unwitting use of multiple accounts. I am going to leave {{subst:uw-agf-sock}} on both user talk pages, and I think that should be sufficient. Closing. Mz7 (talk) 19:14, 3 January 2020 (UTC)- Also a general note: future SPIs will need more evidence than this, especially if requesting CheckUser. We typically require evidence in the form of diffs (see Help:Diff for what they are and how to link to them), and your CheckUser request may be delayed or declined if you do not provide them. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 19:51, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
