Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hibrido Mutante/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Hibrido Mutante

Hibrido Mutante (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
18 April 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Two apparently brand new accounts supporting this editor on the talk page, during a period when he has been engaged in edit warring. Drmies seemed to think Sonduarte was a sock on ANI. Possibly meatpuppetry rather than sockpuppetry, but that's not allowed either. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 21:50, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

It's  Possible the three are the same. TNXMan 19:45, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


25 April 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

This IP address reverted Deconstruction to a version preferred by Hibrido Mutante, who is currently blocked for sockpuppeting and/or meatpuppeting. It geolocates to Portugal, which is where Hibrido Mutante appears to be located (see comments on his talk page, as well as the revision history of John Searle). Hibrido Mutante has previously used the IP address 89.152.84.65, which like this other one geolocates to the region of Porto in Portugal. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 23:34, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

information Administrator note Hibrido Mutante reblocked 2 weeks. Elockid (Talk) 17:01, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


27 April 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Same behavior at Deconstruction as Hibrido Mutante's previous IP sockpuppets/meatpuppets. This IP geolocates to Portugal, like the previous one, although to a different region of the country than the previous IP. Possibly meatpuppetry rather than sockpuppetry, but anyway not acceptable. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 02:32, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

Since his IPs don't seem to fit under a blockable range, I think it might be stale to block this IP. I recommend semi-protection for the future IPs and it looks like Airplaneman (talk · contribs) already protected the page. Elockid (Talk) 12:35, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]