Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HaTikwa/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


HaTikwa

HaTikwa (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
23 July 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


identical attempts to enter citespam here, here & here as HaTikwa and here and here as Okdone. Alcmaeonid (talk) 17:57, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
  • information Administrator note CU isn't necessary here. Per WP:DUCK I've blocked and tagged the sock. I've also blocked the master 3 days for edit warring (see their contribs) and for socking. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 13:01, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

25 September 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Discussion at ANI [1] has established beyond a doubt that User:NoHounding was part of the HaTikwa sockfarm, which is related to a (self-)promotion campaign for writer Michael Kühntopf. This person's named wikipedia account has been banned on other projects for related disruption, and has participated in the socks' reverting campaign at least once recently [2], so there are obvious grounds for suspecting he is the actual sockmaster behind HaTikwa. As this account has otherwise made some reasonable contributions, it might be characterized as a good-hand-bad-hand scheme. Since it's a real-name account of an identifiable person, I'd feel better about blocking if there was checkuser confirmation. Fut.Perf. 07:09, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]