Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Felipe Garcia/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Felipe Garcia

Felipe Garcia (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:

27 June 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Continually spawning new accounts to vandalize NASCAR articles including Ford 400. Probably needs a CU to get a rangeblock. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 19:09, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

 Confirmed (and blocked) all of the following:

Also  Confirmed on my end:

This guy is creating socks across multiple IPs all over the CIDR spectrum at near botlike speed and in spurts. Just block 'em as they come. –MuZemike 20:44, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More:

MuZemike 20:48, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


28 June 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Three accounts created in close succession each time after receiving warnings for continually adding dubious material (spam?) to the Yōshoku and Japanese cuisine articles. DAJF (talk) 13:06, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

 Confirmed and blocked:


28 June 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Repeated vandalism, replacing similar content of a racist nature to Mark Martin, stating that he is an African American, for instance. Similarity in usernames as well, such as the number 1990, and a racial theme. Roodog2k (talk) 14:24, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

 Confirmed and blocked the following:


11 September 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Requested by MuZemike. -- DQ (t) (e) 20:39, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

 Confirmed:

MuZemike 20:49, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Clerk note: Lovely. anyway the lot is dealt with. -- DQ (t) (e) 20:56, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

13 September 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

All single-purpose accounts trying to make Mark Webber and Digimon Canadian. JonChappleTalk 08:22, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Obvious quacking. Blocked for obvious vandalism and personal attacks. Can someone who knows procedure here close and archive. Agathoclea (talk) 10:04, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Marking for close. TNXMan 17:50, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

21 February 2013[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

At WT:AfC Tnas22 created Tyler Allen NASCAR Racing Engineer which was a copyvio.Felipe Garcia's WP:LTA says he includes the name Tyler Racing or Tyler in some of his edits and targets NASCAR. Looks like a duck to me Cobalion. Setting Justice everywhere.active 11:01, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I request CheckUser.Cobalion. Setting Justice everywhere.active 19:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
  • CheckUser requested - Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention - for a sleeper check. Rschen7754 03:41, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Because the article looked like it had an expirienced editor behind it, and crossover in topic, I ran the check. There is nothing to indicate socking at this point in time. Therefore without any further evidence, I recommend that this case be closed without action unless new diffs come to light that can draw a behavoiral connection. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 05:51, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Closing without prejudice to a further case should more similarities be noticed. Rschen7754 05:59, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]