Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Edgarrr/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Edgarrr

Edgarrr (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
15 October 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets [edit]



Evidence submitted by Modelpanicer [edit]

even admits to it on jamesawatson page Modelpanicer (talk) 11:06, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    [edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.

This nomination appears to have been made in bad faith by a sockpuppet of an editor one of whose other sockpuppets I had blocked, see Special:Contributions/Whommighter. The new sockpuppet has now been indef-blocked by another admin. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:18, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users [edit]

No this is an alternate account not a sockpuppet, Admins usually never sockpuppet epecially not James--Lerdthenerd (talk) 11:11, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments [edit]

Legitimate alternative account — move to close this SPI. Favonian (talk) 11:08, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator blocked indef as an obvious troll. Favonian (talk) 11:18, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
17 October 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets [edit]


Evidence submitted by Basispoeter [edit]

Even admits it on his talk page. Similarity of names Basispoeter (talk) 02:56, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    [edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users [edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments [edit]

Filer is  Confirmed as Edgarrr (talk · contribs); the WP:BOOMERANG has returned on him. –MuZemike 03:00, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

20 October 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets [edit]


Evidence submitted by Vrenator [edit]

Vrenator (talk) 11:22, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    [edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users [edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments [edit]
25 October 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets [edit]


Evidence submitted by Checkallower [edit]

check ip, ban dem str8 up yall Checkallower (talk) 12:13, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    [edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users [edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments [edit]
  •  Clerk endorsed - Sock self-ident'ed again, lets check for sleepers pls. -- DQ (t) (e) 12:26, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • information Administrator note In case it wasn't obvious, those identified were blocked under WP:DUCK --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 12:27, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • That looks like everyone. TNXMan 13:31, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
30 October 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets [edit]
Evidence submitted by Reaper Eternal [edit]

He recently came to my user talk page and made edits to it which makes me think that he is the same person as user:Moneysorter who is a sock puppet of user:Edgarrr. He complained about me reverting his edits, which I have not done. However, I did revert Moneysorter's edits. Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, and now User:Vividupperer is making the same style of edits to my user talk page. Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:33, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    [edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users [edit]

Sory? not me Lyingoftener (talk) 00:34, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments [edit]
  • Both blocked indefinitely. Sock or not, their edit patterns were abusive. —C.Fred (talk) 00:39, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed with no sleepers, and  IP blocked as well. TNXMan 15:17, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Edgarrr/Archive&oldid=1066180470"