Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eashleyfox/Archive
Eashleyfox
- Eashleyfox (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
21 October 2021
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
All contributions (with one exception) are to Ted Stamm or its talk page. Not a user who forgets to log in. Previously blocked for edit warring.[1] Example of one of the IPs responding to a warning about editing while logged out : [2] [3] Vexations (talk) 16:34, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]CU won't comment on IPs, sorry. I am about to block the main account for all kinds of other, sufficient reasons. Drmies (talk) 17:20, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think it's fairly clear there's logged-out editing going on here. I've partially blocked from Ted Stamm and the associated talk page for a few months, plus a couple days for (not seeing any good rangeblock options there). I'll try to keep an eye on the page and protect if this continues (@Vexations: feel free to ping me if disruption resumes). Closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 20:36, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
03 November 2021
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Hellotoday2021 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Blocked recently for socking. Now again editing herself despite the financial COI as she operates tedstamm.com website. Diffs: [4], [5], [6], [7] 5.22.207.138 (talk) 18:17, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
Confirmed -- RoySmith (talk) 18:50, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
09 November 2021
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Floofey (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
single-purpose account Vexations (talk) 21:23, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]- Confirmed, blocked and tagged.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:35, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
24 November 2021
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Continuing the pattern of sock editing. I know you can't link an IP with an editor, but I think there's enough for a duck block. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:42, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]- I had blocked before I saw this report – short ones for the time being, they seem to have access to a bunch of IPs. I'll semiprotect the talk page if they continue. Closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 18:15, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
08 December 2021
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Kevaa123 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
New user shows up two days after protection expired, made an edit similar to other socks. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- That certainly was unexpected. Think it's possible that the previous socks/COI editors tried to hire someone to get those edits done? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:14, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Frankly, it's hard to come to any other conclusion here. I'm disappointed. --Yamla (talk) 16:18, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
Unrelated to Eashleyfox and the previous sockpuppets, surprisingly enough. However, Confirmed to blocked spammer, Kiptoo05 (who currently has an open unblock request), also to Manwuel380 and Prince K05. Looks like Kiptoo05 is the oldest of that batch of accounts. --Yamla (talk) 16:11, 8 December 2021 (UTC)- I concur that there might be some sort of connection here, so I'm leaving this filing in place for posterity and have filed pro-forma at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kiptoo05 and handled things there. Closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 16:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Also noting that I've semi'd Ted Stamm again, this time for three months. Paid or not, the page remains a sock magnet. --Blablubbs (talk) 16:25, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
