Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cmach7/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Cmach7

Cmach7 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
04 March 2013
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Vicstars is already  Confirmed by DoRD and Rschen7777 quacks and was locked. Filing for the record. Rschen7754 05:56, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

10 May 2013
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Requested by DQ Legoktm (talk) 02:28, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
  • Mostly a for the record, but some new unblocked accounts:
  •  Confirmed
  •  Likely to Cmach7/socks
  •  Confirmed,  Likely Cmach7

04 June 2013
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Duck requesting sleeper check and IP block. Rschen7754 01:39, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Additional accounts for reference:

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
​—DoRD (talk)​ 02:18, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

16 June 2013
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Obvious quacking edits to SPI. Rschen7754 07:11, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

21 June 2013
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Obvious quacking edits to SPI, need sleeper check and confirm before global lock. Rschen7754 22:40, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

30 June 2013
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Quacking edits to SPI (2nd account in the abusefilter log), requesting IP block. Rschen7754 06:05, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

25 October 2013
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Same abusive SPIs, interest in foreign languages as a disguise, etc. Rschen7754 05:27, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

24 February 2015
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Long-term sockpuppeteer that repeatedly talks about Wikia and The Sims, and typically vandalize articles about those topics. User has also been targeting K6ka (me) and C.Syde65, both of whom frequent The Sims Wiki on Wikia. This has been going on for months, see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive872#Persistent_harassment.2C_sockpuppetry.2C_and_vandalism_by_long-term_disruptive_editor and Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive872#Persistent_harassment.2C_sockpuppetry.2C_and_vandalism_by_long-term_disruptive_editor_-_Again. There are more socks than the amount shown on this list; those usernames have been hidden on my user talk page (see page history).

This request is being filed to (hopefully) set up a range block that will prevent future socks from being created and to put an end to this debacle. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 18:02, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
@Salvidrim!: Well, I don't know. As I understand, CU did not check Cmach7 and he is not confirmed as a master. I don't see any evidence of him being a master either. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:44, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Vanjagenije CU isn't everything, the old accounts are stale so Checkusers can't help much and would "confirm" anything, but that doesn't mean the investigation if done and over. Per the two AN/I threads (1, 2), the SKwiki SPI, per the fact some of the recent socks are named "CoryMach" 1-2-3, and per the fact that Cmach7 has a history of using usernames mocking/taunting established users (see 10 May 2013 case in his archive); I'd be absolutely flabbergasted if this wasn't more of Cmach7's shenanigans. ☺ · Salvidrim! ·  20:30, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Salvidrim! It seams that you are right. I can't be 100% sure, but there is a strong possibility that those are all socks of the same person. Since they are all blocked anyway, I propose we merge this case with Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cmach7. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:16, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not Cmach7 I just impersonated him with the CoryMach user names and I am way wrose then than any user you have ever seen My main account is User:Fredfiggglehorn who was blocked in June. — Preceding unsigned comment added by K6ka1 (talkcontribs) 13:27, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


26 February 2015
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Similar behavior, and their usernames resemble (and it impersonates User:K6ka. ToonLucas22 (talk) 14:35, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

28 October 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


[1] Also see contribution history. GMGtalk 16:14, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I have knowen K6ka3 for many years and he is not a sockpuppet! Hes 100 % genuine person. We go to school together. This pages exisence is slander and libel and Wikipedia will be hearing from my attorneys if this is not taken down!! Wogan James Hemlock (talk) 16:31, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]