Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bokan995/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Bokan995

Bokan995 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
24 August 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Usernames, contributions, timing, reverting the same editor. I would like a CU as I'd also like a check of Xani95 (talk · contribs) who has been suspected of being a sock/meat puppet and although I'm not including him here he should be checked (maybe I should have included him for this, but I'm uncertain. Dougweller (talk) 20:02, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

 Confirmed the following are the same:


27 August 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Contributions & geolocates to the same location (at least as the IP sock in the previous case). If it is agreed that this is a sock of Bokan995, note that he wasn't blocked before - I believe the Administrator missed this edit which shows him backing one of his sock puppet's edits, so the earlier sock puppetry was clearly intentional. Dougweller (talk) 10:54, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another link [1] showing Bokan referring to a sock. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougweller (talkcontribs) 12:02, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by other users[edit]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]
  •  Clerk endorsed. I've blocked per WP:DUCK, but I'm endorsing for sleepers, confirmation to previous accounts (e.g. Ono2) and to see if we can get an IP block here. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 13:05, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • This appears to be  Confirmed; I don't see any new accounts, and unfortunately an IP block does not appear to be practical here. Hersfold (t/a/c) 16:34, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • Enough is enough. Sock master blocked indef as repeat offender. Favonian (talk) 18:14, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

04 September 2011[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Pretty obvious clues (see puppets) as well as contributions, [2] - if I hadn't been involved in reverting his edits I'd block him myself. Dougweller (talk) 20:48, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]