Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AzulAlmonte/Archive

AzulAlmonte

AzulAlmonte (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

26 June 2014

Suspected sockpuppets

70.190.12.130 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
108.90.174.230 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
75.22.41.71 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Editor interaction utility

Would like to know what relationship you have two accounts, it is clear that the IP is the same points as defending champions Ricardo80 in the following articles: La Malquerida, La Gata, Lo Que La Vida Me Robó.

Here I will leave some evidence.

My issue: [1]
In this edition I reverted Ricardo80: [2]
And is this ip appears mysterious: [3]

It is not just an article is all that I have mentioned. GeorgeMilan ^TALK2ME 17:40, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

This was not necessary, first because it was a month ago and the matter was resolved in a good way, was not accusing anyone, just ips are editions were similar to that of AzulAlmonte. There are accusations, only to me editions were similar, and I think it took this long.--Damián (talk) 17:47, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

These are accusations, of course, and if they were subsequently resolved, you should have noted that here so clerks wouldn't have to waste their time. And if in the last sentence you mean that this took too long, I think it languished because the master was an IP, which is a bit of a red flag. I finally took it because I was tired of looking at on my list.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:54, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So take this as you want, I'm just saying I did this application, because issues of these users were similar. But just as no need to do anything, because this already happened a month ago. Anyway I'll leave it here, no need to answer this. That's what you believe and I can not change your opinion, have a nice day and sorry for the inconvenience.--Damián (talk) 18:05, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Clerk note: This was a mess, and I haven't even looked at the merits of it. The original "puppet" was User:Ricardo80. However, that name is a former name of the now-listed master. The editor "reporting" this is User:GeorgeMilan, but that name is the former name of the account that actually created the SPI, User:Damián80. And, of course, an IP is rarely a master. I guess I'll now have to look at the allegations.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:12, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not taking any action. First, FWIW, the three IPs geolocate to completely different places. Second, Damian80 has a habit of accusing other editors simply because he disagrees with them. Third, with respect to 70.190.12.130 and the master, some of their edits occurred within a minute of each other, making it seem unlikely they are the same editor (see master and IP. Finally, these articles are incredibly active and contentious, making it very difficult to sort out who is editing abusively and who is not.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:36, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]