Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arjunkrishna90/Archive

Arjunkrishna90

Arjunkrishna90 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

16 August 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

• Realhindu99 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Realhindu99, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Arjunkrishna90 Both users are committing the same violations (Arjunkrishna90 having been banned for them). Preventing the removal of copyrighted information, undoing any revert he doesn't like by calling it "vandalism/POV/no reference". Pinkfloyd11 (talk) 07:56, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• The following accounts are  Confirmed:

Pavanai45 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Realhindu99 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• I'd say they are  Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) to Arjunkrishna90. I've blocked them as behaviorally linked accounts. Mike V • Talk 17:20, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

---

05 June 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

• Vijays1127 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Same style of deleting all content he doesn't like, saying it is "unsourced and not referenced" even when it clearly is (sometimes he does have a valid point and a citation needed request would be a good start, but very often he doesn't) or just calling it vandalism. Constantly reverting reverts of his deletions. Also, continuing to post edits with long quotes and copyrighted texts. Look at his revision page for a hint at all the massive deletions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Vijays1127; Arjunkrishna:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Arjunkrishna90 and Realhindu99:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Realhindu99. Here is an example of a particular diff where he deletes a ton of information: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Drona&type=revision&diff=783863569&oldid=783819381. Pinkfloyd11 (talk) 07:33, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• I moved the case to the real place (from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vijays1127). Vanjagenije (talk) 18:43, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

This case is being reviewed by Sro23 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

•  Awaiting administrative action The repeated copyright violations, edit-warring with the same user across multiple articles, edit summaries ("Recovering deleted contents" [1] [2]) -  Looks like a duck to me. This is made most obvious on Drona, where Vijays1127 removes basically the same content that the sockmaster did ([3] [4]). Please block this sock. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 01:29, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Done, closing. GAB^gab 01:58, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

---