Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/\\'arrior 786/Archive

\\'arrior 786

Material added at Treaty of Gandamak by blocked User:\\'arrior 786 [1] and material added by new User:Kuzey90 [2] is substansially the same. Same poor english phrase "cedes to proclaim" is used by both users. Jbh (talk) 16:42, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk endorsed - Diffs cited by Jbh are very strong evidence of sock puppetry (block evasion). Vanjagenije (talk) 18:05, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- OK I'm the original blocking admin for this so I decided to take a look when it popped up on my watchlist. I've decided to block the other account as Looks like a duck to me. Everything blocked and tagged. It's up to CheckUser if they need to do anything else :)--5 albert square (talk) 21:08, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Closing the case. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:49, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reinserting same material at Treaty of Gandamak. Quack! Note there is an archived SPI from last week on the two listed SOCKS. Jbh (talk) 18:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Update - Corrected typos in SOCK account and article name. Prior SPI was Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/\\'arrior 786. Jbh (talk) 18:39, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I've blocked the IP for block evasion. Please note that CU won't be used to connect an account to an IP. Mike V • Talk 20:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]