Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/2002 Gujarat Riots 2

2002 Gujarat Riots 2

The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.

Editors involved in this dispute

1. Unbiasedpov (talk · contribs) – filing party
2. Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs)
3. Sdmarathe (talk · contribs)
4. Kautilya3 (talk · contribs)
5. regentspark (talk · contribs)
6. maunus (talk · contribs)
7. VictoriaGrayson (talk · contribs)

Articles affected by this dispute

1. 2002 Gujarat riots#Godhra train burning (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
2. 2002 Gujarat riots#Attacks on Hindus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

• Talk:2002_Gujarat_riots#RfC:_-Add_series_.22Violence_against_Hindus.22_or_Remove_series_.22Violence_against_Muslims_in_India.22.3F
• Talk:2002_Gujarat_riots#Proposal:_Make_Godhra_train_burning_sub-section_accurate

Issues to be mediated

What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

See the Proposal on talk page for details:-

1. Should a navigation bar for series 'Violence against Hindus' be added to "Godhra Train Burning" sub-section of this article?
2. Should the sub-section "Attack on Hindus" be added to series 'Violence against Hindus'?

Additional issues (added by other parties)

• Additional issue 1
• Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.

1. Agree. Unbiasedpov (talk) 22:13, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
2. Agree.VictoriaGrayson^Talk 22:33, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
3. Agree. Sdmarathe (talk) 23:14, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
4. Do not agree. The nominator exhibits poor understanding of Wikipedia policies and neglected to explore other avenues like WP:RSN and WP:DRN. - Kautilya3 (talk) 13:45, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
5. Disagree. There is no clearly defined debate here, merely baseless statements about the bias of certain sources. Vanamonde93 (talk) 13:58, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.

• Reject. Fails to satisfy prerequisite for mediation #5, "A majority of the parties to the dispute consent to mediation." For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:49, 17 September 2015 (UTC)