Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Laurentdion

In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 13:02, 13 September 2006 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 04:07, 27 September 2024 (UTC).

Aaurention (talk · contribs · logs)

Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

Statement of the dispute

User:Aaurention resurrected his talk page on the 22nd August: User_talk:Laretion&oldid=71345363 in order to attack participants in the delete discussion for his vanity page Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Darth_wan

Description

The users talk page is essentially a personal attack on User:Richardjames444 and User:Wildthing61476, through posting of redacted information and old copy from talk pages, inappropriate personal information gathered from other websites, and out-of-context selections from the deletion discussion and discussions between the users in order to disparage the integrity of the delete discussion.

Evidence of disputed behavior

Compare the articles in question:

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Warth_Wan
[1]

Applicable policies and guidelines

{list the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}

Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute

(provide diffs and links)

Talk page exchanges in August: [2]

Users certifying the basis for this dispute

{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}

Other users who endorse this summary

Response

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page. Reinstated his user page in order to attack participants in the deletion process of his vanity page Darth Wan. Reposted redacted personal information from user:Richardjames444 profile as well as supposed personal info from other websites along with out of context edits from the deletion discussion and previous versions of the talk page. 13:02, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User made continual personal attacks on me and posted information about me which I asked him to remove. Wildthing61476 13:30, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]