Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Christinam

In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 02:32, 14 May 2006 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 03:50, 6 June 2024 (UTC).

---

• Christinam (talk · contribs · logs)

also editing as:

• Marielleh (talk · contribs · logs)
• BenMerill (talk · contribs · logs)
• Donut2 (talk · contribs · logs).

also appears to edit on Finnish Wikipedia as [1]

---

Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

Statement of the dispute

This is a summary written by users who dispute this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.

Description

The article Anti-Americanism had reached a stable, year-long consensus after years of POV-warring. User:Christinam has recently emerged, rejected all attempts to cooperate, repeatedly reverted good faith edits by long time contributors, and insulted long term contributors during their attempts to cooperate. Further inspection of his short user history indicates he has little desire to produce content, but mostly trolls high-traffic articles to attack the United States using POV language.

Evidence of disputed behavior

1. Multiple and excessive reversions on Anti-Americanism article. [2], [3]

[4]

1. Ceaseless POV insertions on high-traffic articles about the United States. [5] [6]

[7] [8] and others...

1. Calls other users "immature" and their arguments "nonsense". [9]

Applicable policies and guidelines

{list the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}

1. Wikipedia:Three-revert rule
2. Wikipedia:Assume good faith
3. Wikipedia:Civility

Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute

(provide diffs and links)

1. Marskell [10]
2. Tom harrison [11]
3. Tfine80 [12]

Users certifying the basis for this dispute

{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}

1. Tfine80 03:03, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
2. Marskell 08:35, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Response

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.