Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Xgmx

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Xgmx}} to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Xgmx

• Xgmx (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• ZeroFanMission (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 4.245.74.32 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 4.245.73.195 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 4.245.21.242 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 4.244.3.216 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 4.245.74.168 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

• Code letter: B

• Supporting evidence: User has already been indef blocked in May for sockpuppetry as well as spamming at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Xgmx; another sock case has started at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Xgmx (2nd) for the above users. Further details of the case, as well as a comprehensive sock farm so far is listed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive416#User talk:Xgmx. All IPs come from the same ISP as well as being in the same range. MuZemike (talk) 23:25, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

 Confirmed. Xgmx is stale, but is the same by syllogism[1] Aaron Schulz 09:48, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.