Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/VolcanoXeni

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/VolcanoXeni}} to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

VolcanoXeni

• VolcanoXeni (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• SayNoToCults (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Code letter: F

Contributions and edit pattern are essentially vandalism of CoS articles, right after account created. SayNoToCults looks like a sock of VolcanoXeni evading a ban. Anynobody 05:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

• I also feel that VolcanoXeni is either a sock of another editor, or a user of other socks in its own right. Is it possible to check this fact, without knowing more about specific other potential editors involved? Information on the potential other editors as a result would not be required, simply a "yes" or "no" as per the usage of socks. Smee 08:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC).

• Look at the block log. I already blocked this user as a vandal-only account. Checkuser is probably unnecessary. ··coelacan 08:52, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
• With that in mind, actually, I'm going to go ahead and "de-list" this RFCU. That doesn't stop anyone from re-listing it, but I really don't think there's any point in taking this route. ··coelacan 08:55, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

 Delisted Per request. Real96 09:40, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.