Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Eyrian
Tottering Blotspurs[edit]
request links: view • edit • links • history • watch • talk Filed: 16:50, 18 June 2008 (UTC) |
- Tottering Blotspurs (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Graevemoore (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Code letter: F
- Supporting evidence: ALL edits are to delete articles in a fashion reminiscient of Eyrian and IPs related to Eyrian. For past cases, see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Eyrian and Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/JohnEMcClure. Also, even without the suspected sockpuppetry, the account has engaged in incivility, saying such things as calling opponents "acne-ridden mongoloid fanboys obsessed with keeping every single piece of crap ever written," which suggests the account is not here to contribute constructively or cooperatively with its fellow editors. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 16:50, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
- Is it comedy time? Geographically speaking I am nowhere near any of these IPs, and if your "evidence" is that I vote to delete some cruft then your evidence is a bit thin on the ground. This account is a fully legitimate sock of an established editor, I even made that clear on my userpage. Tottering Blotspurs (talk) 20:22, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
- Legitimate socks do not have incivil and single-purpose disruptive premises for editing. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 21:10, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
- Participating in deletion debates to delete policy violating articles is not disruptive, neither is participating in deletion debates to keep policy compliant articles. Hopefully I will do some of the latter tomorrow as well as the former. Tottering Blotspurs (talk) 21:14, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
- So far you have argued to delete policy compliant articles and having a premise of the acount being based on an overt insult to your fellow contributors is unacceptable. Not to mention that legitimate alternate accounts acknowledge who they are an alternate of a la User:Bearian'sBooties or User:Chaser away. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 21:29, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
- Participating in deletion debates to delete policy violating articles is not disruptive, neither is participating in deletion debates to keep policy compliant articles. Hopefully I will do some of the latter tomorrow as well as the former. Tottering Blotspurs (talk) 21:14, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
- Legitimate socks do not have incivil and single-purpose disruptive premises for editing. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 21:10, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
- Additional information needed - can someone clarify why 72.151.55.27 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) is mentioned here, and its relevance to the case? - Alison ❤ 22:38, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
- One of the ones suspected to be Eyrian in a previous Eyrian related Request for Checkuser. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 22:41, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
- Unrelated Thatcher 23:27, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for your efforts. Could the civility issue still be addressed, i.e. comments like calling opponents "acne-ridden mongoloid fanboys obsessed with keeping every single piece of crap ever written"? Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 23:36, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- Clerk assistance requested: Merge with RFCU/Eyrian please. Thatcher 23:27, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Eyrian[edit]
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 22:27, 19 May 2008 (UTC) |
- Graevemoore (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Code letter: B
- Supporting evidence:
I'm afraid to me it looks like the arbcom-banned and desysopped User:Eyrian has returned. Eyrian's mainspace edits focused in metallurgy/blacksmithing. His AfD participation focused on anti-popular culture and fiction related articles. Eyrian's various accounts were blocked last fall, but on December 31, 2007 a new account suddenly appeared with edits following a very, almost identical Eyrian-like pattern in that the mainspace edits are similarly overwhelmingly focused on metallurgy/blacksmithing and its AfD participation is focused overwhelmingly on attempting to delete fiction and popular culture related articles. Not likely a coincidence.
- Supporting evidence:
- compare this with this
- Their image uploads and layout thereof are even similar: User:Eyrian/Created#Images and User:Graevemoore
- The IP 72.151.55.27 says: "It's been awhile since I've seen an ipc article nominated", but he has no real ipc AfD participation prior to that post diff
- Neither Eyrian nor Graevemoore have email enabled
- Graevemore already has a couple talk page warnings for suspected hoax articles or copy vios: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Graevemoore&oldid=194501994
- For 71.9.8.150 see diff
- This IP seems similar: contribs of 75.5.225.151
- Both have an interest in armor: Graevemoore created Filippo_Negroli - Eyrian created Charles_ffoulkes
- Both have an interest in Germany: Graevemoore created New_Germany_State_Park - Eyrian created Cultus_Ferox
- Both have an interest in metal working: Graevemoore created Hardfacing - Eyrian created Planishing
- Note, the earlier RFCU on Eyrian was here: Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/JohnEMcClure
Submitted. — Rlevse • Talk • 22:27, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- As the person who spotted Eyrian's socking (which Eyrian himself later confirmed), I endorse this request. Concerns remain. DurovaCharge! 23:53, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Furthermore - similar behaviour at AfD -see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dungeons & Dragons creatures vs. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azalin Rex (2nd nomination) - both appear to be keen to get the last word in. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 07:58, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Deferred another checkuser. Try asking Morven, Lar or Dmcdevit. Graevemoore is not himself running socks but Eyrian's edits are stale unless another CU saved their results. Thatcher 00:16, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Looks like it was Morven so I will post a note there referring to here. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:17, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Clerk note: Graevemoore blocked indef, 72.151.55.27 3 months, and 71.9.8.150 3 months by Vassyana (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) under per QUACK. — Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.