Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/SimpsonsFan08

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/SimpsonsFan08}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

SimpsonsFan08[edit]

  • Supporting evidence: See One, Two, and Three. I'm submitting this following a discussion with Rlevse about the continuous flow of sockpuppets. I'm requesting that a rangeblock be applied to include the underlying IPs, assuming the collateral damage is minimal. The reason I believe checkuser is justified in this case is because there is no end in sight to the abusive sockpuppeteering. Every time a sockpuppet is outed by User:EJF or myself (and then blocked), another one appears. Enigma message 23:19, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: I endorse this request. As soon as his socks are blocked, he makes new ones. Pls block underlying IPs too. RlevseTalk 01:37, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • So we're stuck, basically. Unfortunate, because the socks keep flying in. Enigma message 04:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I added King Monty IV and Connorjack to the list at the top. Not that it matters much, though. As of now, Grandoldman is the only one of the accounts that's not blocked. Enigma message 04:35, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: all accounts blocked and tagged. Tiptoety talk 16:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.