Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Qwerty612

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Qwerty612}} to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Qwerty612

• Qwerty612 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Beej (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Eivind (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Code letter: G

• Supporting evidence:

A group of editors are pushing the same WP:BLP violation at Keith Henson, a notable Scientology critic. [1][2][3] There has been a lengthy history of COI editing and sock or meat puppetry by pro-Scientology editors. Jehochman ^Talk 23:08, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

 Inconclusive. Eivind has been editing since 2002, and Beej since 2005, and they've displayed no particular association with Scientology that I could see in the past, so I'd need much stronger evidence to CU them. Qwerty612 was new, and looked very much like a SPA sock, so I did CU him, but didn't see any obvious sock-master. I note that he hasn't edited in over a month. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:20, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Okay then it is probably just a coincidence that they are all showing up with the same argument. Jehochman ^Talk 00:30, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.