Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Poison sf

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Poison sf}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Poison sf

[edit]

The Stormfront (website) wikipedia article has been embroiled in a massive edit war for several days. I uncovered evidence of sock puppetry/meat puppetry on a massive scale (see below). The editors continue to scrap other editors' contributions, including one with 11 cites that was claimed to be inappropriate due to "original research".

These editors make the same reverts. I have provided links to two users who sent each other messages on their talk pages, strategizing the reversion of pages to avoid violating the 3RR rule.

The Stormfront forum also contains a post to recruit editors to 'keep an eye on' the Stormfront article dated September 14th:[http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=326372]

Notice that one of the poster's username on Stormfront is Poison. As in Poison sf? Stick to the Facts 02:46, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not positive but I assume Poison sf is the head puppet because he is the only one who has been editing the article for over 8 days. This almost certainly involves a few different people.

  • Many new people began editing the Stormfront wiki article on sept 15th: [1]
  • User Brimba's user contributions page - began heavy editing of Stormfront article beginning Sept 15th [2]
  • User Conserve's user contributions page - account first used to edit on Sept 13th, has only edited Stormfront articles. [3]
  • User Magnetic's contributions page - account first used to edit on Sept 13th, has only edited Stormfront articles: [4]
  • User ExplicitImplicity's contributions page, created account Sept 11th, first edit was stormfront article on Sept 13th:[5]
  • User Alecmconroy's contributions page, began editing stormfront article heavily Sept 16th:[6]
  • User UberCryxic's contributions page, began editing stormfront article heavily Sept. 16th:[7]
  • Alecmconroy's talk page, showing solicitations from UberCryxic to assist in reverting pages:[8]
  • UberCryxic's talk page, discussing teaming up in reverting to avoid 3RR:[9]

Stick to the Facts 04:11, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know why I'm bothering with this, but I should let people know that most of the users up there are experienced Wikipedia editors who are obviously not sockpuppets of anyone. This nominating user has had some serious problems over the past few days in the Stormfront article, accusing people there of vandalism left and right. He is not being civil at all, and this RFCU is nothing more than an attempted subversion of Wikipedia policies.UberCryxic 13:02, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I should add - UberCryxic claims to have replied to an RfC - but he first edited the Stormfront article or posted to the discussion BEFORE the RFC was posted.

RFC date found here:15:59 Sept 16th http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Politics

UberCryxic first edit to stormfront article: 13:49PM Sept 16th:[10]

Stick to the Facts 18:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I invite all editors to click the link above that Stick gave. You'll see my first ever edit to Stormfront was this:
17:49, 16 September 2006 (hist) (diff) Stormfront (website) (divided lead in two paragraphs)
That's 5:49 pm, about two hours after Poison put up the article at RFC. This is just an amazingly bad job at lying by Stick. There is a reason Wikipedia keeps records. The 13:49 PM figure for this article is complete bull; you won't find it anywhere in my edit history.UberCryxic 23:14, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Discussion moved to talk. Voice-of-All 23:06, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Red X Unrelated I checked a representative sample of the accounts. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 20:47, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Poison_sf&oldid=1138658605"