Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Nightshadow28

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Nightshadow28}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Please see Liancourt Rocks, 2005 in Japan, Korea, Usan-do. This user has engaged in seriously edit war. also, personal attack. and, i catch evidence Endroit = Watermint. [1] Replystay 11:42, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

information Note: This should be listed at the top of the page. Mackensen (talk) 00:37, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
information Note: Moved. WjBscribe 02:29, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The rationale for this checkuser ("Code letter:C and E") is now suspect, because this was a tit-for-tat request by Replystay (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki), who was verified to be a possible sock of Bason0 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki).
See Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Bason0 (for the "tat").
However, please do go ahead with this request to prove my innocence. Thank you.--Endroit 17:37, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Checkuser is not a tool to establish innocence. I'd tend to decline this one unless there is better information provided. (I'm new at the en process so take that as a comment rather than a decline) ++Lar: t/c 01:30, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It wasn't requested by one of the people listed, it was just a comment from one of the accused saying he's not a puppet/puppetmaster (in other words, it's not a "prove my innocence" request). Kwsn(Ni!) 23:15, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Additional information needed Please provide diffs that show there has been a 3RR violation across the accounts, in a similar format to what is seen on WP:AN3. --Deskana (banana) 11:03, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's apparent that Replystay (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki) has not edited in over a week since filing this report. If my request above is holding back the closing of this report, I'll take it back.
See also Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Komdori & Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Nightshadow28, for the corresponding bogus report filed by this group of users.--Endroit 12:04, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Rejected. No evidence of 3RR violation provided. --Deskana (apples) 13:40, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nightshadow28 did major revert many of korean relation article.

[2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] I suspect Nightshadow28 is socketpuppert, too. also, His edit and major revert is falsed POV wiothout fact. clearly vandalsim. i warned his talk page.

However, His article and edit page are very similar with other user's edit. For example, This is user Komdori's edit. [21] This is LactoseTI's edit. [22] see? exactly same edit. i think LactoseTI and Komdori are cleary suspected socket puppet. and Nightshadow28 revert it, too. [23] I thinkg these user are same guy and act like a multiple player. Jh5trealteeth 12:32, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello administrators and clerks. I'm sorry to be such a nuisance to you... User:Jh5trealteeth has been blocked as obvious sockpuppet of Bason0. I hope this bogus and strange report is rejected. --Nightshadow28 12:50, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: case re-archived. Anthøny (talk) 15:17, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.