Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/MeBee
Appearance
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
MeBee[edit]
- MeBee (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Melissadolbeer (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Bejnar (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- By George (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Anikk (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Georgeslegloupier (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
MeBee seems to be trying to advance the same completely without merit theory as User:Melissadolbeer about Authentic Matthew, though this time calling the article Constantine Conspiracy.
Shared traits include the same completely wierd way of boldfacing random words in paragraphs, and the fact that User:MeBee seems to have dug out an old page from the history of Authentic Matthew (which is now a redirect) and put it into User:MeBee's userspace.
I suspect that additional sockpuppets include
- User:Bejnar (this seems to be the account that makes all the edits that aren't related to the Constantine Conspiracy article, aka main account)
- User:By George (new user, sockpuppet - agrees with MeBee and constantly says things like Constantine Conspiracy should be expanded not merged on its talk page)
- User:Anikk (new user, has hardly any edits whatsoever, all related to Constantine Conspiracy, appears to be a strawman designed to make a fake afd so that it looks like the community kept the article)
- User:Georgeslegloupier might be a role account? though might be completely unrelated
Clinkophonist 22:30, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.