Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/KingsOfHearts

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/KingsOfHearts}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.


KingsOfHearts 4

[edit]
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 22:18, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Yet another sock of banned user KingsOfHearts (talk · contribs), obvious by tone and contribution history. I suggest WP:RBI. //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 22:13, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dsticker has only edited the talk page of one article. Can you make a better case? — Rlevse • Talk • 23:22, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Supposedly brand-new user; similar editing interest; savvy about what a sockpuppet is [1]; referring again to O'Reilly's lengthy criticism page [2] (not by name, as everyone on the discussion knows what he's talking about, i.e. "Olbermann's counterpart"); and "self-conscious defense" of the indef-blocked Fru23 [3] despite Fru23 not even having been directly brought up. Typical sock behavior. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 02:30, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with Bugs, I was on my way to file when I saw this. His very first edit was to call another editor biased, basically taking up the fight for his suspected sockmaster. I basically called him a sock on the page, and go no denial. Has no interest in anything other than continuing the fight started by his suspected sockmaster. Dayewalker (talk) 03:10, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to Bugs for being more verbose and including diffs. There is little question that this is another sock by which a banned editor is continuing to push his agenda. //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 18:33, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Red X Unrelated — Rlevse • Talk • 20:32, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


KingsOfHearts 3

[edit]
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 20:42, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Still might be a good idea to run it, considering the level of disruption. Depending on the result, I might move for a community ban. Blueboy96 23:02, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed Currently availabe technical evidence indicates that the following accounts are related:

  1. KingsOfHearts (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  2. Fru23 (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  3. JFC1993 (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  4. Bint7 (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  5. Wit001 (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  6. Op4life (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  7. Xrxty (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  8. J4J4ahsproxy (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  9. JcLiner (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

 Unlikely Currently available technical evidence indicates that is is unlikely that the following account is related to those above:

  1. JackyRT (talk · contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

-- Avi (talk) 05:23, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 IP blocked -- Avi (talk) 05:28, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Confirmed accounts indef blocked and tagged. Tiptoety talk 20:33, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

KingsOfHearts 2

[edit]
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 21:06, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Only hours after KingsOfHearts and Fru23 were blocked, JcLiner appears, and immediately starts contributing to the very same articles that Fru23 and KingsOfHearts contributed. That wouldn't be problematic in and of itself, except his sixth edit was to immediately state on his userpage, "I am not a sock of Fru23," and his seventh edit was to jump into the ANI discussion. User also states intent to "continue where he (Fru23) left off" after being blocked. Blueboy96 21:06, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coupled with the behavior, that's enough for me, speaking as a former admin on political sims. Indefblocked. Blueboy96 21:39, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
To add, I've found that the following are also  Confirmed as KingsOfHearts:
  1. Wit001 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  2. Bint7 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  3. Op4life (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

No edits, but matching user agents and user creation just a few minutes apart from editing activity from KingsOfHearts or Fru23. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 21:02, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wknight94 has indef-blocked those 3 sleeper account. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 21:35, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


KingsOfHearts

[edit]
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 01:51, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

ARE YOU JOKING Barneca THE ONLY ARTICLE I HAVE EDITED THAT IS REMOTELY SIMILAR IS THE OREILLY ONE. EVERYONE SEEMS TO FORGET THAT EVEN IF WE ARE SOMEHOW SOCKS THAT IS NOT A BANABLE/BLOCKABLE OFFENSE we have not crossed paths ONCE! I AM TYPING IN CAPS BECAUSE I AM YELLING VERY LOUD! Someone is tell me if there is anything I can do to make him shut up about this stupid meatpuppet accusations? Fru23 (talk) 03:47, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In other words--all  Confirmed? Blueboy96 15:52, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, Lobocf and Wikiport edit from different ips and are most likely different from the puppetmaster of the others, and probably not even the same editor as between themselves. Fred Talk 15:57, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the clarification. KingsOfHearts, Fru23 and Xrxty all blocked indef; 72.192.216.42 blocked 48 hours. Blueboy96 16:09, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/KingsOfHearts&oldid=1148853144"