Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Flavio Brandani

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Flavio Brandani}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Flavio Brandani[edit]

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 11:37, 25 May 2007

Flavio.brandani (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Succhiacazzo (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Code letter: G

Please be patient and forget my bad english... this is a complex case :-)

Flavio.brandani is permanently banned here, and had other bans on it.wikipedia and it.wikibooks (and in other projects I don't remember right now), where is suspected to act like a troll, simulating ingenuity. Succhiacazzo is a vandalism-only user, with a name meaning sth like "cock sucker" in italian...

Le last signed a comment in Brandani page with the signature of the first. The nickname "rejected tiger" use in the signature is in the tipical style of Brandani, and the first part of the message is perfectly fitting his way of speaking.

Brandani behavior on it.wiki in the past led to permanent lock of blocked users' pages (they were usually left unlocked after Brandani cried for a space to defend himself after one of his many vandalisms).

Since Brandani is now unblocked on it.wiki, and is asking to unlock again talk pages of blocked users, I would like to check for the definitive proof he is just playing the game. Before you ask: I know his vandalisms could be more than enough for an infinite farewell on your wiki, but on it.wiki community is *much* forgiving, so a hard proof may be needed. Please be gentle and leave a notice here when done, I do not check en.wiki often. --Jollyroger 11:36, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I understand the request. These folks are obviously the same user. What more is needed? Mackensen (talk) 15:51, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We need, if it's possible, a check user as a sort of unobjectable proof that the two users belong to the same person, because he is really clever in claiming he is "innocent" and that he is a good-but-a-bit-clumsy user every time he does something against the rules, ad, believe or not, many people believe him. If you can kindly do that, it would be helpful for us. Thanks and forget my english... --IlSoge aka Sogeking 10:59, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed. Voice-of-All 17:15, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --IlSoge aka Sogeking 13:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.