Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ehinger222

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ehinger222}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
See also Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Rugby 666

Ehinger222[edit]

  • Code letter: F

This editor's contribs bear remarkable similarities to a series of edits made by user:Ehinger222 around the end of August, in particular POV pushing over the naming of rugby league and football (soccer) - see [[1]] and [[2]]; slandering of Alan Oakley for the supposed crime of being anti-rugby league - see [[3]] and [[4]].

user:Okay that does not make sense hopped on and simply reverted a number of edits i made to articles that user:147.10.112.157 had contributed to beforehand - see contribs for 147.10.112.157 and Okay that does not make sense. Clearly (IMO) the same person.

Once User:147.10.112.157 was blocked, user user:Tenuous_walker and user:Caesar34 popped up making similar edits.

user:Rugby 666 popped up a couple of days after user:ehinger222 stopped editing. He/she edited almost solely rugby league related articles for the best part of a month until he/she saw fit to join in similar edit wars to the above named editors.

After user:147.10.112.157 and User:Caesar34 were both blocked for a week - the former for npov warring and the latter for block evasion user:Rugby 666 became the "current" account for this sockpuppeteer - he/she hops from account to account as others are blocked, and jumps into the same old wars.

Apparently user:Rugby 666 didn't much like me alleging that he/she is a sockpuppet, and removed his/her username from this page [[5]], removed the warning from his/her userpage [[6]], and accused me of vandalism [[7]] (misusing the template vandal template in the process). This is consistent with the behaviour of sockpuppets of User:Licinius and User:NSWelshman- to wit, see User:J is me's history: [[8]], and User:Factoid Killer's as well: [[9]].

I suspect, owing to very similar manner and interests that this sockpuppeteer is the same as both Licinius (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) and NSWelshman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log). Though without going through with a fine tooth comb I admit it may be somewhat difficult to tie this down. Dibo T | C 12:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very tedious accusation that does not actually outline the case or the interaction between us. Dibo just accused me of being a sockpuppet even though I was well established before the original accusations were even created. I have stated elsewhere that this type of boring stuff is ruining wikipedia for me, but if an administrator desires a proper defense, please only ask as I am more than willing to make one if it ends Dibo's constant vandalism of my user page! --Rugby 666 02:54, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
information Note: I'm looking at this now; results in a bit. Dmcdevit·t 04:43, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
 Inconclusive regarding Ehinger222; the account is too old.
 Confirmed all the rest are the same, as well as Freddie 34 (talk · contribs), Raezar34 (talk · contribs), and Chuq Hater (talk · contribs). Dmcdevit·t 09:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Ehinger222&oldid=1080974766"