Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dr. Anymouse

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dr. Anymouse}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Dr. Anymouse[edit]

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 22:18, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Dr. Anymouse (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
71.191.7.3 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

Code letter: E

Supporting evidence:

Dr. Anymouse has been warned about 3RR with regards to edits at Fibromyalgia here and here.
71.191.7.3 has been blocked for edit warring at the same article here
User:Sciencewatcher has made a similar allegations here

Clerk note: Case filed by User:Orangemarlin (note made for transparency). Tiptoety ^talk 22:20, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
All I see is some weak inductive logic, so Additional information needed. Please provide additional evidence of a relationship between Dr. Anymouse and 71.191.7.3. Are they making the same type of edits to Fibromyalgia? Are their noticeable patterns in their style of editing? Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 00:29, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
FYI: Anon user and I are roomies. We also swap bodily fluids. Does that help? I am trying to convince her to register. Dr. Anymouse (talk) 19:29, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ewwww. TMI. --Deskana (talk) 20:37, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that's conclusive. No need for an RfCU, we can just move on to WP:SSP.OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 22:31, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think we can mark this case Completed. Perhaps the thread above can be taken elsewhere -- it doesn't concern the sockpuppetry allegations. [[Sam Korn]] ^(smoddy) 00:01, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk note: discussion moved to the talk page, per Deskana's TMI policy. -- lucasbfr ^talk 13:36, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.