Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/CENA LUV

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/CENA LUV}} to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

CENA LUV

• CENA LUV (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• SKITTLES (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• WWEFAN4EVA (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Oth is luv (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

User has previously been blocked for abusive use of sockpuppets (WWEFAN4EVA, Oth is luv, though these accounts are no longer active). See [Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/CENA_LUV]. User is currently using the SKITTLES and CENA LUV accounts to produce virtually identical edits and is using both accounts to commit numerous image copyright and fair-use infractions. User uses one account when the other account is blocked. Yamla 20:41, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

 Clerk note: Why do you need checkuser? It sounds like you've got the situation figured out. Obvious sockpuppets can be blocked without checkuser evidence. Thatcher131 (talk) 23:30, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

 Declined per Thatcher. Looks pretty obvious. Mackensen (talk) 00:36, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.