Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/BADMINton

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/BADMINton}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

BADMINton

BADMINton (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Shivraj Singh (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
DPSingh (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Y not (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Many tendentious edits, a 3RR violation and personal attacks as evidenced from User talk:BADMINton. He has earned a block, but his pattern of editing is very similar to User:Y not, another of the Rajput socks, identified 4 months after the ArbCom ruling that banned DPSingh for a year: Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Rajput. I'd like to enforce an indef on User:BADMINton for block evasion and evasion of the ArbCom ruling. Thank you. -- Samir धर्म 09:50, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also Good Bloke (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) whose first edits were to defend BADMINton on ANI -- Samir धर्म 16:49, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk note: The other accounts are all too old to check against, however there may be useful information in the previous case Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/DPSingh. Thatcher131 (talk) 11:08, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Deferred to Morven. Mackensen (talk) 16:25, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Plz check against these accounts too.In my opinion his edits are similar to them. Ikon |no-blast 16:56, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk note: You linked to a list of IP addresses. IP addresses are almost never confirmed publicly except in extraordinary circumstances. Thatcher131 23:55, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Link has user:VandalPatrol,user:PandalPetrol etc.check against them coz they are permabanned.Look at the indicative statement below too.with regards . Ikon |no-blast 12:53, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing here, ol' chums? Getting me banned? I do not know any DP or CP Singh. I am none of them. And why does every "admin" forget that only usernames can be banned from editing the Wikipedia and not users. Asking people to ban me indicates that administrators fear that I too would become an admin. ♔BADMIN♛ (आओ✍) 09:38, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly is happening here and what is Ikonoblast's point? ♔BADMIN♛ (आओ✍) 13:51, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possible There may be some links between users mentioned here, but there is insufficient evidence to be sure. Impossible to prove any links between these and former Rajput vandals. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 00:14, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.