Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/68.54.56.198

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/68.54.56.198}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

68.54.56.198[edit]

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 12:45, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I've got pretty strong evidence here. Both sockpuppets act like the owner of a link in question (which we know is true with the sockpuppeteer; they go by the handle of Advocate diff and have an e-mail address at the link in question diff), and they use the EXACT SAME argument when it comes to keeping the link. As this one has to be concise, a detailed argument is at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/68.54.56.198. NASCAR Fan24(radio me!) 12:45, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that there are meatpuppets floating around at First-person shooter; whether these are or not remains to be seen. NASCAR Fan24(radio me!) 14:59, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, both 68.54.56.198 (on Talk:First-person shooter) and HavenBastion on (User talk:HavenBastion) claim to own the website in question (i.e. they both call it "my site"). I think that's pretty solid evidence, especially since neither has bothered to read WP:EL and WP:COI; they both use the same argument that their website is a good resource. NASCAR Fan24(radio me!) 13:54, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: case listed, but if I may, if you're convinced by editing patterns that the IP and the user are the same person already, what are you expecting from this RFCU? -- lucasbfr talk 16:22, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just in case they decide to take up the "it wasn't me!" defence, a successful RFCU will trump them and remove any uncertainty and doubt. They've got a history of being ignorant and dishonest, so they'll likely dispute the results of a SSP case alone. NASCAR Fan24(radio me!) 16:35, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

no Declined. CheckUser unnecessary; user is blocked already. Dmcdevit·t 23:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/68.54.56.198&oldid=1136435321"