Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (2nd)[edit]

  • Supporting evidence: TheYellowMoose fits the description of our serial sock-puppeteer (uses "This page intentionally left blank" for his user page in plain reference to mine) but so far only two edits and they are not conclusive, could be another sleeper? ...Dave1185 (talk) 01:27, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Unlikely -- At this time it is unlikely that there is a connection to the sockmaster. -- Avi (talk) 03:02, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • Thanks for the help in checking, don't mind me being cautious b'cos I've been watching the new users' creation log all day for something that matches the sneaky lil' bastard. Sorta like Grawp hunting, haha! ...Dave1185 (talk) 03:48, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ[edit]

  • Supporting evidence: Sockfarm being used to harass users involved with the block of ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ. This is a patently obvious sock farm. The bottom 3 on the list were blocked by me after vandalising user pages. The top three were pre-emptively blocked by me after culling through the user creation logs. This is likely a larger sock farm, and we need to ferret out any sleepers and IP addresses and block those as well. Thanks for your prompt attention. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:36, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ
Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#More abuse by User:ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ
Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of 218.188.90.194

The user enjoys using "hohoho" and barely types capital letters. He obsesses with Dave1185 (talk · contribs) and seems to use open proxies.--Caspian blue (talk) 04:49, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed - the following as being the one editor:
  1. ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  2. Huangdidavyjones (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  3. DavyJonesshihhuangdi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  4. Softball Bugs (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  5. Huangdi super emperor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  6. Vietnameseischinesenotcantoneseisvietnamese (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  7. Nefbmn (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  8. Huang IV 4 fourth (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  9. DavyJonesHuangDi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Alison 05:04, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
DavidtheProxyusertoevadeblocks (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki) another one likely to be the same user. See if that one is part of a sockfarm like todays batch. BTW, as an aside, Alison rules... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 05:11, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A different IP (surprise!) but same useragent, so that's a strong  Likely:
  1. DavidtheProxyusertoevadeblocks (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  2. DavyJones873 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) --> Confirmed sock: Exhibit similar behaviour as per [1] - clearly as part of a orchestrated series of malicious attacks designed to harass & diminish Dave1185's standing here & in the web space. No known constructive edit seen to date, except for a specific mention of a YouTube link (See the crafted user's profile there) that was created on 2 Oct 2008, shortly after a series of warnings & ANI cases were brought up against the primary sockpuppet. Pse enforce indef block ASAP to pre-empt further abuse as per [2] -- Aldwinteo (talk) 16:55, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. 黄帝 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
and  IP blocked for a while, hardblock - possible proxy - Alison 05:21, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Biscuityellow86 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) probably is as well judging by the IP's sole edit [3], which was also to User talk:Vietnameseischinesenotcantoneseisvietnamese. --Kralizec! (talk) 12:30, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Likely - Alison 17:36, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Raisininthemoon (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki) is another suspect, same vandal behavior on the page of User:Baseball Bugs. ...Dave1185 (talk) 18:45, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1. SantaDAFANTA (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki) is another who vandalised my page identical to all the others. Submitting to check for sock farm and IPs/Proxy check. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 21:27, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed} - both of those. They're one-off accounts on their own IPs - Alison 02:24, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1. CaspianYellowEmperorPearTrees (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
  2. Apple trees (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki),
Could you also check this impersonating accounts to leave inappropriate message to me? It is odd that if the two were ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ, he really quickly figured out my previous screen name and it is not consistent to his fondness of using "HuangDi". I think the account could be copycats.--Caspian blue (talk) 02:51, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Both of the above are  Confirmed, needless to say, as well as the three or four others since then.
information Note: - due to ongoing socking and harassment, the following IP ranges have been blocked for two weeks. There should be minimal collateral damage - I checked first:
  1. 70.107.72.0/21 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) - Alison 07:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. 162.83.128.0/17 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) - Alison 07:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Alison 07:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Request, could you confirm on whether ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ is a reincarnation of RestoreTheEmpireSociety (talk · contribs) The users share the same obsession of empire or emperor. The habits of vadalism[4] are identical to each other, and they use same ISP as well as live in the same location. (Queens, NY) Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/RestoreTheEmpireSociety. RestoreTheEmpireSociety was blocked for his racist attacks/vandalism in June after a ANI report on him, and ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ appeared here around July. I believe that the page should be merged into one if they're the same troll.--Caspian blue (talk) 07:55, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd say it's likely on behaviour, but I've no way of telling per checkuser as the old case data is  Stale - Alison 07:59, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.