Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/SqueakBox and Zapatancas/Workshop

This is a page for working on Arbitration decisions. It provides for suggestions by Arbitrators and other users and for comment by arbitrators, the parties and others. After the analysis of /Evidence here and development of proposed principles, findings of fact, and remedies. Anyone who edits should sign all suggestions and comments. Arbitrators will place proposed items they have confidence in on /Proposed decision.

Motions and requests by the parties

Suggestion

Block Zapatancas for this vandalism today, SqueakBox 15:08, 26 May 2006 (UTC) 1) I have already seen the proposed resolution of the Arbitration Committee and I have detected that after a year of fighting against ceaseless harassment it has become very difficult to distinguish the effort and behavior of a honest user (myself, in my opinion) to that of a user acting in complete bad faith (SqueakBox, in my opinion). I don't blame the arbitrators for having difficulties in that regard. I would like only to request to the people in charge that they analyzed if the mechanisms that protect honest users from unwarranted attacks and from ill-treatment are as good as they should. If when I looked for help a year ago (example) somebody would have simply answered me perhaps all this could have been avoided. Zapatancas 08:37, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

You are not an honest user, you are someone who engages in death threats through sockpuppets, etc, and the harrassment has been coming 90% from you. How can you claim to be honest while making death threats and telling disgusting lies. No tienes verguenza? Accusing me of fucking my dead dog and my wife of being a transvestite and unfaithful and then you call yourself an honest user and accuse me of harrassment. Have you no shame? Your pl;ea for help was 5 days too alte as you had already decided to go for the delinquent path of using SquealingPig to have your childish tantrum. Why did you do it? Why will you not take responsibil;ity for your horrible attacks and behaviour? SqueakBox 02:21, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed temporary injunctions

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed final decision

Proposed principles

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Edit warring over spelling and other style issues is harmful, even ridiculous

1) Edit warring is harmful. Wikipedia:Manual_of_style#Disputes_over_style_issues emphasizes the undesirability of edit warring over national spelling, see Wikipedia:Manual_of_style#National_varieties_of_English.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed findings of fact

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Personal attacks by SqueakBox

2) SqueakBox has made personal attacks [1] and [2].

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Violation of assume good faith by SqueakBox

3) SqueakBox, in his relationship with Zapatancas, has failed to assume good faith [3].

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Personal attacks and vandalism by Zapatancas

4) Zapatancas has made personal attacks and engaged in user page vandalism [4] (Zapatancas's response), traveled and travelled are both correct)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

I don't agree with the assertion that I have vandalized SqueakBox's user page. All user pages are subjected to WP:OWN so they can be edited by other users. The text I deleted was very offensive in my view. "Going beyond the call of duty" means "reverting ceaselessly" and "rather strange people" is not only an outright insult but it also means: I revert them but I have never tried to understand them, that's why they looked so strange to me. I think that is a pure exhibition of antiwikipedism. I deleted what I considered to be a personal attack (and I still do) that was very offensive from my point of view. Zapatancas 08:16, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

What are yuo talking about? These comments were added to my page by Guettarda when awarding me a wiki medal. Zapatancas removed the comments and medal because he didn't think I deserved them, a clear act of vandalsim that he now tries to justify with a fib. I mean who exactly was insulting who? Well clealr y Zapatancas was insulting me bvy removing the medal, end of story. It is also another indication of zapatancas poor level of English and his obsession with me, SqueakBox 02:18, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Comment by others:

Edit warring over spelling and other style differences

5) Both parties have engaged in edit warring over fussy copyediting, doing such things as reverting each other's spelling of traveled or travelled (both are correct-travelled is chiefly British) [5]. [6], legalizing to legalising, legalising to legalizing, and [[7]], see edit warring, http://www.tysto.com/articles05/q1/20050324uk-us.shtml SqueakBox preferring British spelling and certain other usages, [8].

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Accusations of death threats

6) According to SqueakBox, Zapatancas (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) editing as the sockpuppets SquealingPig (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and SquealingPigAttacksAgain (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has made death threats [9]

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed remedies

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed enforcement

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Analysis of evidence

Place here items of evidence (with diffs) and detailed analysis

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

General discussion

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others: